Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shlomi Amitai
dblp:330/9768
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 92% Autonomous driving · 8% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Underwater · ICRA 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
monocular depth estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Underwater · ICRA 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
self-supervised depth estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Underwater · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Underwater · ICRA 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation › scene depth estimation
underwater depth estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Underwater · ICRA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised learning · 0.7reprojection loss · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Self-Supervised Monocular Depth UnderwaterabstractDepth estimation is critical for any robotic system. In the past years, the estimation of depth from monocular images has shown great improvement. However, in the underwater environment results are still lagging behind due to appearance changes caused by the medium. So far little effort has been invested in overcoming this. Moreover, underwater, there are more limitations to using high-resolution depth sensors, which is a serious obstacle to generating ground truth. So far unsupervised methods that tried to solve this have achieved limited success as they relied on domain transfer from a dataset in the air. We suggest network training using subsequent frames, self-supervised by a reprojection loss, as was demonstrated successfully above water. We propose several additions to the self-supervised framework to cope with the underwater environment and achieve state-of-the-art results on a challenging forward-looking underwater dataset. Shlomi Amitai, Itzik Klein, Tali Treibitz |
ICRA | 1 |