Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shlomi Amitai

dblp:330/9768 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 92% Autonomous driving · 8%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.712023
Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Underwater · ICRA 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
monocular depth estimation
0.712023
Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Underwater · ICRA 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
self-supervised depth estimation
0.712023
Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Underwater · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.212023
Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Underwater · ICRA 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation › scene depth estimation
underwater depth estimation
0.212023
Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Underwater · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-supervised learning · 0.7reprojection loss · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Self-Supervised Monocular Depth Underwater
abstract
Depth estimation is critical for any robotic system. In the past years, the estimation of depth from monocular images has shown great improvement. However, in the underwater environment results are still lagging behind due to appearance changes caused by the medium. So far little effort has been invested in overcoming this. Moreover, underwater, there are more limitations to using high-resolution depth sensors, which is a serious obstacle to generating ground truth. So far unsupervised methods that tried to solve this have achieved limited success as they relied on domain transfer from a dataset in the air. We suggest network training using subsequent frames, self-supervised by a reprojection loss, as was demonstrated successfully above water. We propose several additions to the self-supervised framework to cope with the underwater environment and achieve state-of-the-art results on a challenging forward-looking underwater dataset.
Shlomi Amitai, Itzik Klein, Tali Treibitz
ICRA1