Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Scott Thomas Andersen

dblp:331/0648 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-1225-6312ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 61% Software maintenance and evolution · 30% Empirical software engineering · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program synthesis and code generation › code documentation generation
code comment generation
1.012026
ComCat: Expertise-Guided Context Generation to Enhance Code Comprehension · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026
Software maintenance and evolution › program comprehension
code comprehension
1.012026
ComCat: Expertise-Guided Context Generation to Enhance Code Comprehension · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
1.012026
ComCat: Expertise-Guided Context Generation to Enhance Code Comprehension · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.312026
ComCat: Expertise-Guided Context Generation to Enhance Code Comprehension · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.0expertise-guided context · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 ComCat: Expertise-Guided Context Generation to Enhance Code Comprehension
abstract
Software maintenance constitutes a substantial portion of the total lifetime costs of software, with a significant portion attributed to code comprehension. Software comprehension is eased by documentation such as comments that summarize and explain code. We present ComCat , an approach to automate comment generation by augmenting Large Language Models (LLMs) with expertise-guided context to target the annotation of source code with comments that improve comprehension. Our approach enables the selection of the most relevant and informative comments for a given snippet or file containing source code. We develop the ComCat pipeline to comment C/C++ files by (1) automatically identifying suitable locations in which to place comments, (2) predicting the most helpful type of comment for each location, and (3) generating a comment based on the selected location and comment type. In a human subject evaluation, we demonstrate that ComCat -generated comments significantly improve developer code comprehension across three indicative software engineering tasks by up to 13% for 80% of participants. In addition, we demonstrate that ComCat -generated comments are at least as accurate and readable as human-generated comments and are preferred over standard ChatGPT-generated comments for up to 92% of snippets of code. Furthermore, we develop and release a dataset containing source code snippets, human-written comments, and human-annotated comment categories. ComCat leverages LLMs to offer a significant improvement in code comprehension across a variety of human software engineering tasks.
Skyler Grandel, Scott Thomas Andersen, Yu Huang 0015, Kevin Leach
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.2