Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ali Jamadi

dblp:331/1348 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2092-1953ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Concurrent programming · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed computing theory › concurrent objects
concurrent data structures
0.712023
Efficient Bounded Timestamping from Standard Synchronization Primitives · PODC 2023
Distributed computing theory
shared memory
0.712023
Efficient Bounded Timestamping from Standard Synchronization Primitives · PODC 2023
Distributed computing theory
timestamping
0.712023
Efficient Bounded Timestamping from Standard Synchronization Primitives · PODC 2023
Concurrent programming › synchronization
synchronization primitives
0.212023
Efficient Bounded Timestamping from Standard Synchronization Primitives · PODC 2023
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Efficient bounded timestamping from standard synchronization primitives
Benyamin Bashari, Ali Jamadi, Philipp Woelfel
Distributed Comput.2
2023 Efficient Bounded Timestamping from Standard Synchronization Primitives
abstract
Bounded timestamps [10, 20] allow a temporal ordering of events in executions of concurrent algorithms. They are a fundamental and well studied building block used in many shared memory algorithms. A concurrent timestamp system keeps track of m timestamps, which is usually greater or equal to the number of processes in the system, n. A process may, at any point, obtain a new timestamp, and later determine a total order of all process's most recent timestamps. Known timestamp algorithms do not scale well in the number of processes. Getting a new timestamp takes at least a linear number of steps, and a lower bound by Israeli and Li [20] implies that each timestamp needs to be represented by at least Ω(m) bits.
Benyamin Bashari, Ali Jamadi, Philipp Woelfel
PODC2
2022 ISAIR: Deep inpainted semantic aware image representation for background subtraction
Mahdi Abolfazli Esfahani, Ali Jamadi, Messiah Abolfazli Esfahani
Expert Syst. Appl.2