As Large Language Models (LLMs) evolve into lifelong AI assistants, LLM personalization has become a critical frontier. However, progress is currently bottlenecked by the absence of a gold-standard evaluation benchmark. Existing benchmarks either overlook personalized information management that is critical for personalization or rely heavily on synthetic dialogues, which exhibit an inherent distribution gap from real-world dialogue. To bridge this gap, we introduce AlpsBench, An LLM PerSonalization benchmark derived from real-world human-LLM dialogues. AlpsBench comprises 2,500 long-term interaction sequences curated from WildChat, paired with human-verified structured memories that encapsulate both explicit and implicit personalization signals. We define four pivotal tasks - personalized information extraction, updating, retrieval, and utilization - and establish protocols to evaluate the entire lifecycle of memory management. Our benchmarking of frontier LLMs and memory-centric systems reveals that: (i) models struggle to reliably extract latent user traits; (ii) memory updating faces a performance ceiling even in the strongest models; (iii) retrieval accuracy declines sharply in the presence of large distractor pools; and (iv) while explicit memory mechanisms improve recall, they do not inherently guarantee more preference-aligned or emotionally resonant responses. AlpsBench aims to provide a comprehensive framework.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved rapid progress and are increasingly deployed in real-world applications such as digital assistants, education, healthcare, and recommendation. This deployment has driven growing interest in LLM personalization, which seeks to align model behavior with individual preferences and evolving contexts. Despite the rapid development of this area, existing research remains scattered, and a systematic tutorial dedicated to LLM personalization is still lacking. This tutorial presents a unified technical framework for LLM personalization, organized around five core dimensions: user memory, personalization architecture, alignment and post-training, inference-time adaptation, and deployment. We show how these components transform LLMs from generic response generators into user-adaptive systems, enabling structured user representation, memory integration, personalized optimization objectives, and context-aware reasoning throughout the model lifecycle. We further discuss key challenges, including lifelong learning, preference drift, privacy-preserving adaptation, trustworthiness, and evaluation under dynamic user distributions. By consolidating recent advances, this tutorial aims to equip participants with a comprehensive and principled understanding of LLM personalization and to inspire continued innovation in this rapidly evolving field.

Knowledge transfer-based few-shot learning (FSL) aims at improving the recognition ability of a novel object under limited training samples by transferring relevant potential knowledge from other data. Most related methods calculate such knowledge to refine the representation of a novel sample or enrich the supervision to a classifier during a transfer procedure. However, it is easy to introduce new noise during the transfer calculations since: (1) the unbalanced quantity of samples between the known (base) and the novel categories biases the contents capturing of the novel objects, and (2) the semantic gaps existing in different modalities weakens the knowledge interaction during the training.