Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Guanyu Nie

dblp:331/1658 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 71% Approximation and online algorithms · 14% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 14%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 40% Language models and text generation · 34% Efficient and distributed learning · 26%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › agentic language model › tool-augmented language models
function calling
0.912025
Robust Function-Calling for On-Device Language Model via Function Masking · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › edge computing › on-device machine learning
on-device learning
0.912025
Robust Function-Calling for On-Device Language Model via Function Masking · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
DR-submodular maximization
0.812024
Gradient Methods for Online DR-Submodular Maximization with Stochastic Long-Term Constraints · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization
online optimization
0.812024
Gradient Methods for Online DR-Submodular Maximization with Stochastic Long-Term Constraints · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization › submodular maximization
online submodular maximization
0.812024
Gradient Methods for Online DR-Submodular Maximization with Stochastic Long-Term Constraints · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization
0.812024
Gradient Methods for Online DR-Submodular Maximization with Stochastic Long-Term Constraints · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
combinatorial bandits
0.712023
A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit Feedback · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.712023
A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit Feedback · ICML 2023
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning
0.712023
A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit Feedback · ICML 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
regret minimization
0.712023
A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit Feedback · ICML 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › LLM agents
tool use
0.312025
Robust Function-Calling for On-Device Language Model via Function Masking · ICLR 2025
Mathematical optimization › submodular optimization
submodular maximization
0.212023
A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit Feedback · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

offline approximation algorithm adaptation · 1.3bandit feedback · 1.3instruction tuning · 0.9function masking · 0.9regret analysis · 0.8gradient ascent · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Robust Function-Calling for On-Device Language Model via Function Masking
abstract
Large language models have demonstrated impressive value in performing as autonomous agents when equipped with external tools and API calls. Nonetheless, effectively harnessing their potential for executing complex tasks crucially relies on enhancements in their function-calling capabilities. This paper identifies a critical gap in existing function-calling models, where performance varies significantly across benchmarks, often due to over-fitting to specific naming conventions. To address such an issue, we introduce Hammer, a novel family of foundation models specifically engineered for on-device function calling. Hammer employs an augmented dataset that enhances models’ sensitivity to irrelevant functions and incorporates function masking techniques to minimize over-fitting. Our empirical evaluations reveal that Hammer not only outperforms larger models but also demonstrates robust generalization across diverse benchmarks, achieving state-of-the-art results. Our open-source contributions include a specialized dataset for irrelevance detection, a tuning framework for enhanced generalization, and the Hammer models, establishing a new standard for function-calling performance.
Qiqiang Lin, Muning Wen, Qiuying Peng, Guanyu Nie, Junwei Liao, Xiaoyun Mo, Jiamu Zhou, Yin Zhao, Jun Wang 0012, Weinan Zhang 0001
ICLR4
2025 Stochastic k-Submodular Bandits with Full Bandit Feedback
Guanyu Nie, Vaneet Aggarwal, Christopher J. Quinn
AAMAS1
2024 Gradient Methods for Online DR-Submodular Maximization with Stochastic Long-Term Constraints
abstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of online monotone DR-submodular maximization subject to long-term stochastic constraints. Specifically, at each round $t\in [T]$, after committing an action $\mathbf{x}_t$, a random reward $f_t(\mathbf{x}_t)$ and an unbiased gradient estimate of the point $\widetilde{\nabla}f_t(\mathbf{x}_t)$ (semi-bandit feedback) are revealed. Meanwhile, a budget of $g_t(\mathbf{x}_t)$, which is linear and stochastic, is consumed of its total allotted budget $B_T$. We propose a gradient ascent based algorithm that achieves $\frac{1}{2}$-regret of $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T})$ with $\mathcal{O}(T^{3/4})$ constraint violation with high probability. Moreover, when first-order full-information feedback is available, we propose an algorithm that achieves $(1-1/e)$-regret of $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T})$ with $\mathcal{O}(T^{3/4})$ constraint violation. These algorithms significantly improve over the state-of-the-art in terms of query complexity.
Guanyu Nie, Vaneet Aggarwal, Christopher J. Quinn
NeurIPS1
2023 A Framework for Adapting Offline Algorithms to Solve Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Problems with Bandit Feedback
abstract
We investigate the problem of stochastic, combinatorial multi-armed bandits where the learner only has access to bandit feedback and the reward function can be non-linear. We provide a general framework for adapting discrete offline approximation algorithms into sublinear $\alpha$-regret methods that only require bandit feedback, achieving $\mathcal{O}\left(T^\frac{2}{3}\log(T)^\frac{1}{3}\right)$ expected cumulative $\alpha$-regret dependence on the horizon $T$. The framework only requires the offline algorithms to be robust to small errors in function evaluation. The adaptation procedure does not even require explicit knowledge of the offline approximation algorithm — the offline algorithm can be used as black box subroutine. To demonstrate the utility of the proposed framework, the proposed framework is applied to multiple problems in submodular maximization, adapting approximation algorithms for cardinality and for knapsack constraints. The new CMAB algorithms for knapsack constraints outperform a full-bandit method developed for the adversarial setting in experiments with real-world data.
Guanyu Nie, Yididiya Y. Nadew, Yanhui Zhu, Vaneet Aggarwal, Christopher J. Quinn
ICML1
2023 Size-constrained k-submodular maximization in near-linear time
abstract
We investigate the problems of maximizing k-submodular functions over total size constraints and over individual size constraints. k-submodularity is a generalization of submodularity beyond just picking items of a ground set, instead associating one of k types to chosen items. For sensor selection problems, for instance, this enables modeling of which type of sensor to put at a location, not simply whether to put a sensor or not. We propose and analyze threshold-greedy algorithms for both types of constraints. We prove that our proposed algorithms achieve the best known approximation ratios for both constraint types, up to a user-chosen parameter that balances computational complexity and the approximation ratio, while only using a number of function evaluations that depends linearly (up to poly-logarithmic terms) on the number of elements n, the number of types k, and the inverse of the user chosen parameter. Other algorithms that achieve the best-known deterministic approximation ratios require a number of function evaluations that depends linearly on the budget B, while our methods do not. We empirically demonstrate our algorithms’ performance in applications of sensor placement with k types and influence maximization with k topics.
Guanyu Nie, Yanhui Zhu, Yididiya Y. Nadew, Samik Basu 0001, Aduri Pavan, Christopher J. Quinn
UAI1
2022 An explore-then-commit algorithm for submodular maximization under full-bandit feedback
abstract
We investigate the problem of combinatorial multi-armed bandits with stochastic submodular (in expectation) rewards and full-bandit feedback, where no extra information other than the reward of selected action at each time step $t$ is observed. We propose a simple algorithm, Explore-Then-Commit Greedy (ETCG) and prove that it achieves a $(1-1/e)$-regret upper bound of $\mathcal{O}(n^\frac{1}{3}k^\frac{4}{3}T^\frac{2}{3}\log(T)^\frac{1}{2})$ for a horizon $T$, number of base elements $n$, and cardinality constraint $k$. We also show in experiments with synthetic and real-world data that the ETCG empirically outperforms other full-bandit methods.
Guanyu Nie, Mridul Agarwal, Abhishek K. Umrawal, Vaneet Aggarwal, Christopher J. Quinn
UAI1