Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kunyuan Ding

dblp:331/2357 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 56% Time series and sequential data · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection
0.612022
OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
out-of-distribution detection
0.612022
OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
model uncertainty
0.212022
OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

post-hoc detection · 0.6benchmarking · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 OpenOOD: Benchmarking Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection
abstract
Out-of-distribution (OOD) detection is vital to safety-critical machine learning applications and has thus been extensively studied, with a plethora of methods developed in the literature. However, the field currently lacks a unified, strictly formulated, and comprehensive benchmark, which often results in unfair comparisons and inconclusive results. From the problem setting perspective, OOD detection is closely related to neighboring fields including anomaly detection (AD), open set recognition (OSR), and model uncertainty, since methods developed for one domain are often applicable to each other. To help the community to improve the evaluation and advance, we build a unified, well-structured codebase called OpenOOD, which implements over 30 methods developed in relevant fields and provides a comprehensive benchmark under the recently proposed generalized OOD detection framework. With a comprehensive comparison of these methods, we are gratified that the field has progressed significantly over the past few years, where both preprocessing methods and the orthogonal post-hoc methods show strong potential.
Pengyun Wang, Dejian Zou, Zitang Zhou, Kunyuan Ding, Wenxuan Peng, Bo Li 0080, Yiyou Sun, Xuefeng Du, Kaiyang Zhou, Wayne Zhang 0001, Dan Hendrycks, Yixuan Li 0001, Ziwei Liu 0002
NeurIPS5