EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jieyi Bi
dblp:331/2378
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-9480-3434ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 78% Efficient and distributed learning · 16% Reinforcement learning · 6% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 77% Algorithms and data structures · 23% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › combinatorial optimization
vehicle routing |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Learning to Handle Complex Constraints for Vehicle Routing Problems · NeurIPS 2024 Learning Generalizable Models for Vehicle Routing Problems via Knowledge Distillation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RL4CO: An Extensive Reinforcement Learning for Combinatorial Optimization Benchmark · KDD (2) 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › combinatorial optimization
neural combinatorial optimization |
0.8 | 2 | 2024 | Learning Generalizable Models for Vehicle Routing Problems via Knowledge Distillation · NeurIPS 2022 Learning to Handle Complex Constraints for Vehicle Routing Problems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
constrained optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Handle Complex Constraints for Vehicle Routing Problems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › constrained optimization
lagrangian methods |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Handle Complex Constraints for Vehicle Routing Problems · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Generalizable Models for Vehicle Routing Problems via Knowledge Distillation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for combinatorial optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | RL4CO: An Extensive Reinforcement Learning for Combinatorial Optimization Benchmark · KDD (2) 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Learning Generalizable Models for Vehicle Routing Problems via Knowledge Distillation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.7proactive infeasibility prevention · 0.8lagrangian multipliers · 0.8auxiliary decoder · 0.8knowledge distillation · 0.6adaptive multi-distribution training · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Learning to Solve Complex Constrained Routing Problems with Feasibility-Guided Reward And Diversity-Guided Policy
Yuanxu Yang, Zikang Yu, Jiahai Wang, Jieyi Bi, Jinbiao Chen, Zizhen Zhang |
PPSN (1) | 4 |
| 2025 | RL4CO: An Extensive Reinforcement Learning for Combinatorial Optimization BenchmarkabstractCombinatorial optimization (CO) is fundamental to several realworld applications, from logistics and scheduling to hardware design and resource allocation.Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has recently shown significant benefits in solving CO problems, reducing reliance on domain expertise and improving computational efficiency.However, the absence of a unified benchmarking framework leads to inconsistent evaluations, limits reproducibility, and increases engineering overhead, raising barriers to adoption for new researchers.To address these challenges, we introduce RL4CO, a unified and extensive benchmark with in-depth library coverage of 27 CO problem environments and 23 state-of-the-art baselines.Built on efficient software libraries and best practices in implementation, RL4CO features modularized implementation and flexible configurations of diverse environments, policy architectures, RL algorithms, and utilities with extensive documentation.RL4CO helps researchers build on existing successes while exploring and developing their own designs, facilitating the entire research process by decoupling science from heavy engineering.We finally provide extensive benchmark studies to inspire new insights and future work.RL4CO has already attracted numerous researchers in the community and is open-sourced at https://github.com/ai4co/rl4co 1 . Federico Berto, Chuanbo Hua, Junyoung Park 0002, Laurin Luttmann, Yining Ma 0001, Fanchen Bu, Jiarui Wang 0002, Haoran Ye, Minsu Kim 0004, Sanghyeok Choi, Nayeli Gast Zepeda, André Hottung, Jianan Zhou 0002, Jieyi Bi, Fei Liu 0044, Hyeonah Kim, Jiwoo Son, Haeyeon Kim, Davide Angioni, Wouter Kool 0001, Zhiguang Cao, Qingfu Zhang 0001, Joungho Kim, Jie Zhang 0002, Kijung Shin, Cathy Wu 0002, Sungsoo Ahn, Guojie Song, Changhyun Kwon 0001, Kevin Tierney, Jinkyoo Park |
KDD (2) | 14 |
| 2024 | Learning to Handle Complex Constraints for Vehicle Routing ProblemsabstractVehicle Routing Problems (VRPs) can model many real-world scenarios and often involve complex constraints. While recent neural methods excel in constructing solutions based on feasibility masking, they struggle with handling complex constraints, especially when obtaining the masking itself is NP-hard. In this paper, we propose a novel Proactive Infeasibility Prevention (PIP) framework to advance the capabilities of neural methods towards more complex VRPs. Our PIP integrates the Lagrangian multiplier as a basis to enhance constraint awareness and introduces preventative infeasibility masking to proactively steer the solution construction process. Moreover, we present PIP-D, which employs an auxiliary decoder and two adaptive strategies to learn and predict these tailored masks, potentially enhancing performance while significantly reducing computational costs during training. To verify our PIP designs, we conduct extensive experiments on the highly challenging Traveling Salesman Problem with Time Window (TSPTW), and TSP with Draft Limit (TSPDL) variants under different constraint hardness levels. Notably, our PIP is generic to boost many neural methods, and exhibits both a significant reduction in infeasible rate and a substantial improvement in solution quality. Jieyi Bi, Yining Ma 0001, Jianan Zhou 0002, Wen Song 0004, Zhiguang Cao, Yaoxin Wu, Jie Zhang 0002 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Learning Generalizable Models for Vehicle Routing Problems via Knowledge DistillationabstractRecent neural methods for vehicle routing problems always train and test the deep models on the same instance distribution (i.e., uniform). To tackle the consequent cross-distribution generalization concerns, we bring the knowledge distillation to this field and propose an Adaptive Multi-Distribution Knowledge Distillation (AMDKD) scheme for learning more generalizable deep models. Particularly, our AMDKD leverages various knowledge from multiple teachers trained on exemplar distributions to yield a light-weight yet generalist student model. Meanwhile, we equip AMDKD with an adaptive strategy that allows the student to concentrate on difficult distributions, so as to absorb hard-to-master knowledge more effectively. Extensive experimental results show that, compared with the baseline neural methods, our AMDKD is able to achieve competitive results on both unseen in-distribution and out-of-distribution instances, which are either randomly synthesized or adopted from benchmark datasets (i.e., TSPLIB and CVRPLIB). Notably, our AMDKD is generic, and consumes less computational resources for inference. Jieyi Bi, Yining Ma 0001, Jiahai Wang, Zhiguang Cao, Jinbiao Chen, Yuan Sun 0003, Yeow Meng Chee |
NeurIPS | 1 |