Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ritwik Sadhu

dblp:331/3463 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 62% Trustworthy machine learning · 19% 3D vision · 19%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation
0.612022
Statistical, Robustness, and Computational Guarantees for Sliced Wasserstein Distances · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.612022
Statistical, Robustness, and Computational Guarantees for Sliced Wasserstein Distances · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport › wasserstein distance
sliced wasserstein distance
0.612022
Statistical, Robustness, and Computational Guarantees for Sliced Wasserstein Distances · NeurIPS 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision
robust estimation
0.212022
Statistical, Robustness, and Computational Guarantees for Sliced Wasserstein Distances · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.212022
Statistical, Robustness, and Computational Guarantees for Sliced Wasserstein Distances · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

subgradient optimization · 1.1monte carlo estimation · 1.1minimax risk analysis · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Geometry Regularized Point Cloud Autoencoder
abstract
Point cloud is a prevalent format in representing 3D geometry. Regardless of the recent advances, unsupervised learning for 3D point clouds remains arduous for various tasks due to its unorganized and sparsely distributed nature. To address this challenge, we propose a geometry regularized point cloud autoencoder, aiming to preserve local geometry structure. In particular, based on the Mahalanobis distance, we propose a point cloud geometry metric counting the local statistics. It endeavors to maximize the posterior probability of the reconstruction conditioned on the input point cloud. Our eigenspace analysis reveals the adaptivity of the developed metric—it behaves differently given different local structures. Moreover, a coarse-to-fine training strategy by varying the metric granularity is applied, leading to our proposed geometry regularized point cloud autoencoder. By applying our proposal to several off-the-shelf point cloud autoencoders, we show an improved point cloud reconstruction quality. In addition, the superior representability of our learned features is also demonstrated via an object classification task.
Ritwik Sadhu, Jiahao Pang, Dong Tian
ICIP1
2022 Statistical, Robustness, and Computational Guarantees for Sliced Wasserstein Distances
abstract
Sliced Wasserstein distances preserve properties of classic Wasserstein distances while being more scalable for computation and estimation in high dimensions. The goal of this work is to quantify this scalability from three key aspects: (i) empirical convergence rates; (ii) robustness to data contamination; and (iii) efficient computational methods. For empirical convergence, we derive fast rates with explicit dependence of constants on dimension, subject to log-concavity of the population distributions. For robustness, we characterize minimax optimal, dimension-free robust estimation risks, and show an equivalence between robust sliced 1-Wasserstein estimation and robust mean estimation. This enables lifting statistical and algorithmic guarantees available for the latter to the sliced 1-Wasserstein setting. Moving on to computational aspects, we analyze the Monte Carlo estimator for the average-sliced distance, demonstrating that larger dimension can result in faster convergence of the numerical integration error. For the max-sliced distance, we focus on a subgradient-based local optimization algorithm that is frequently used in practice, albeit without formal guarantees, and establish an $O(\epsilon^{-4})$ computational complexity bound for it. Our theory is validated by numerical experiments, which altogether provide a comprehensive quantitative account of the scalability question.
Sloan Nietert, Ziv Goldfeld, Ritwik Sadhu, Kengo Kato
NeurIPS3