Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Moritz Weckbecker

dblp:331/3701 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › concept-based explanation
concept activation vector
0.912025
Navigating Neural Space: Revisiting Concept Activation Vectors to Overcome Directional Divergence · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.912025
Navigating Neural Space: Revisiting Concept Activation Vectors to Overcome Directional Divergence · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pattern-based CAVs · 0.9linear classifier · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Navigating Neural Space: Revisiting Concept Activation Vectors to Overcome Directional Divergence
abstract
With a growing interest in understanding neural network prediction strategies, Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) have emerged as a popular tool for modeling human-understandable concepts in the latent space. Commonly, CAVs are computed by leveraging linear classifiers optimizing the *separability* of latent representations of samples with and without a given concept. However, in this paper we show that such a separability-oriented computation leads to solutions, which may diverge from the actual goal of precisely modeling the concept direction. This discrepancy can be attributed to the significant influence of distractor directions, i.e., signals unrelated to the concept, which are picked up by filters (i.e., weights) of linear models to optimize class-separability. To address this, we introduce *pattern-based CAVs*, solely focussing on concept signals, thereby providing more accurate concept directions. We evaluate various CAV methods in terms of their alignment with the true concept direction and their impact on CAV applications, including concept sensitivity testing and model correction for shortcut behavior caused by data artifacts. We demonstrate the benefits of pattern-based CAVs using the Pediatric Bone Age, ISIC2019, and FunnyBirds datasets with VGG, ResNet, ReXNet, EfficientNet, and Vision Transformer as model architectures.
Frederik Pahde, Maximilian Dreyer, Moritz Weckbecker, Leander Weber, Christopher J. Anders, Thomas Wiegand 0001, Wojciech Samek, Sebastian Lapuschkin
ICLR3