Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gonca Yilmaz
dblp:331/6227
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 83% Legged, aerial and field robots · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › controller design
controller tuning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Weighted Maximum Likelihood for Controller Tuning · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Weighted Maximum Likelihood for Controller Tuning · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Weighted Maximum Likelihood for Controller Tuning · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Weighted Maximum Likelihood for Controller Tuning · ICRA 2023 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots › quadrotor
quadrotor flight |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Weighted Maximum Likelihood for Controller Tuning · ICRA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weighted maximum likelihood · 0.7policy search · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Weighted Maximum Likelihood for Controller TuningabstractRecently, Model Predictive Contouring Control (MPCC) has arisen as the state-of-the-art approach for model-based agile flight. MPCC benefits from great flexibility in trading-off between progress maximization and path following at runtime without relying on globally optimized trajectories. However, finding the optimal set of tuning parameters for MPCC is challenging because (i) the full quadrotor dynamics are non-linear, (ii) the cost function is highly non-convex, and (iii) of the high dimensionality of the hyperparameter space. This paper leverages a probabilistic Policy Search method—Weighted Maximum Likelihood (WML)—to automatically learn the optimal objective for MPCC. WML is sample-efficient due to its closed-form solution for updating the learning parameters. Additionally, the data efficiency provided by the use of a model-based approach allows us to directly train in a high-fidelity simulator, which in turn makes our approach able to transfer zero-shot to the real world. We validate our approach in the real world, where we show that our method outperforms both the previous manually tuned controller and the state-of-the-art auto-tuning baseline reaching speeds of 75 km/h. Angel Romero, Shreedhar Govil, Gonca Yilmaz, Yunlong Song, Davide Scaramuzza 0001 |
ICRA | 3 |