Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shreedhar Govil

dblp:331/6290 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 83% Legged, aerial and field robots · 17%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › controller design
controller tuning
0.712023
Weighted Maximum Likelihood for Controller Tuning · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.712023
Weighted Maximum Likelihood for Controller Tuning · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.712023
Weighted Maximum Likelihood for Controller Tuning · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
aerial robots
0.212023
Weighted Maximum Likelihood for Controller Tuning · ICRA 2023
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots › quadrotor
quadrotor flight
0.212023
Weighted Maximum Likelihood for Controller Tuning · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

weighted maximum likelihood · 0.7policy search · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 JENGA: Object selection and pose estimation for robotic grasping from a stack
abstract
Vision-based robotic object grasping is typically investigated in the context of isolated objects or unstructured object sets in bin picking scenarios. However, there are several settings, such as construction or warehouse automation, where a robot needs to interact with a structured object formation such as a stack. In this context, we define the problem of selecting suitable objects for grasping along with estimating an accurate 6DoF pose of these objects. To address this problem, we propose a camera-IMU based approach that prioritizes unobstructed objects on the higher layers of stacks and introduce a dataset for benchmarking and evaluation, along with a suitable evaluation metric that combines object selection with pose accuracy. Experimental results show that although our method can perform quite well, this is a challenging problem if a completely error-free solution is needed. Finally, we show results from the deployment of our method for a brick-picking application in a construction scenario.
Sai Srinivas Jeevanandam, Sandeep Inuganti, Shreedhar Govil, Didier Stricker, Jason R. Rambach
IROS3
2023 Weighted Maximum Likelihood for Controller Tuning
abstract
Recently, Model Predictive Contouring Control (MPCC) has arisen as the state-of-the-art approach for model-based agile flight. MPCC benefits from great flexibility in trading-off between progress maximization and path following at runtime without relying on globally optimized trajectories. However, finding the optimal set of tuning parameters for MPCC is challenging because (i) the full quadrotor dynamics are non-linear, (ii) the cost function is highly non-convex, and (iii) of the high dimensionality of the hyperparameter space. This paper leverages a probabilistic Policy Search method—Weighted Maximum Likelihood (WML)—to automatically learn the optimal objective for MPCC. WML is sample-efficient due to its closed-form solution for updating the learning parameters. Additionally, the data efficiency provided by the use of a model-based approach allows us to directly train in a high-fidelity simulator, which in turn makes our approach able to transfer zero-shot to the real world. We validate our approach in the real world, where we show that our method outperforms both the previous manually tuned controller and the state-of-the-art auto-tuning baseline reaching speeds of 75 km/h.
Angel Romero, Shreedhar Govil, Gonca Yilmaz, Yunlong Song, Davide Scaramuzza 0001
ICRA2