EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Simon Damm
dblp:331/9351
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-4584-1765ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Security and privacy · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | One (Noisy) Bit to Rule Them All: Key Recovery from Randomness Leakage in ML-DSAabstractAbstract The Fiat-Shamir transform is one of the most widely applied methods for secure signature construction. Fiat-Shamir starts with an interactive zero-knowledge identification protocol and transforms this via a hash function into a non-interactive signature. The protocol’s zero-knowledge property ensures that a signature does not leak information on its secret key $${\textbf{s}}$$ s , which is achieved by blinding $$\vec {s}$$ s → via proper randomness $${\textbf{y}}$$ y . Most prominent Fiat-Shamir examples are EC-DSA signatures and the new post-quantum standard ML-DSA (aka Dilithium). In practice, EC-DSA signatures have experienced fatal attacks via leakage of a few bits of the randomness $${\textbf{y}}$$ y per signature. Similar attacks now emerge for lattice-based signatures, such as ML-DSA. We build on, improve and generalize the pioneering leakage attack on ML-DSA by Liu, Zhou, Sun, Wang, Zhang, and Ming. Using a transformation to Integer LWE (ILWE), their attack can recover a 256-dimensional subkey of ML-DSA-44 from leakage in a single bit of $$\textbf{y}$$ y per signature, in any bit position $$j \ge 6$$ j ≥ 6 . However, the number of required signatures grows exponentially as $$4^j$$ 4 j . In this work, we show that not all leaky signatures carry information about the secret subkey. We introduce the notion of informative signature relations. This notion allows us to define a preprocessing step, called filter-and-shift that leads to ILWE instances that require a smaller sample amount. Unlike the standard ILWE transformation, filter-and-shift exploits the smallness of secret keys, and therefore might be of independent cryptanalytic interest. In comparison to Liu et al., for $$j=6$$ j = 6 we require only a quarter of the signatures and reduce the exponential growth to $$2^j$$ 2 j . In addition, we show that the secret subkey can be recovered even with a leak bit corrupted by a large amount of noise, in theory up to the maximum of $$50\%$$ 50 % . Experimentally, we still recover the secret with $$43\%$$ 43 % noise, where we need 170 times as many signatures as in the noise-free setting. The attack applies more generally to all Fiat-Shamir-type lattice-based signatures. For a signature scheme based on module LWE over an $$\ell $$ ℓ -dimensional module, the attack uses a 1-bit leak per signature to efficiently recover a $$\frac{1}{\ell }$$ 1 ℓ -fraction of the secret key. In the ring LWE setting, which can be seen as module LWE with $$\ell = 1$$ ℓ = 1 , the attack recovers the whole key. Simon Damm, Nicolai Kraus, Alexander May 0001, Julian Nowakowski, Jonas Thietke |
J. Cryptol. | 1 |
| 2025 | Solving Concealed ILWE and Its Application for Breaking Masked Dilithium
Simon Damm, Asja Fischer, Alexander May 0001, Soundes Marzougui, Leander Schwarz, Henning Seidler, Jean-Pierre Seifert, Jonas Thietke, Vincent Ulitzsch |
ASIACRYPT (2) | 1 |
| 2025 | One Bit to Rule Them All - Imperfect Randomness Harms Lattice Signatures
Simon Damm, Nicolai Kraus, Alexander May 0001, Julian Nowakowski, Jonas Thietke |
PKC (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | ELBO, regularized maximum likelihood, and their common one-sample approximation for training stochastic neural networksabstractMonte Carlo approximations are central to the training of stochastic neural networks in general, and Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) in particular. We observe that the common one-sample approximation of the standard training objective can be viewed both as maximizing the Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) and as maximizing a regularized log-likelihood of a compound distribution. This latter approach differs from the ELBO only in the order of the logarithm and expectation, and is theoretically grounded in PAC-Bayes theory. We argue theoretically and demonstrate empirically that training with the regularized maximum likelihood increases prediction variance, enhancing performance in misspecified settings, adversarial robustness, and strengthening out-of-distribution (OOD) detection. Our findings help reconcile previous contradictions in the literature by providing a detailed analysis of how training objectives and Monte Carlo sample sizes affect uncertainty quantification in stochastic neural networks. Sina Däubener, Simon Damm, Asja Fischer |
UAI | 2 |
| 2025 | AnomalyDINO: Boosting Patch-based Few-Shot Anomaly Detection with DINOv2abstractRecent advances in multimodal foundation models have set new standards in few-shot anomaly detection. This paper explores whether high-quality visual features alone are sufficient to rival existing state-of-the-art vision-language models. We affirm this by adapting DINOv2 for oneshot and few-shot anomaly detection, with a focus on industrial applications. We show that this approach does not only rival existing techniques but can even outmatch them in many settings. Our proposed vision-only approach, AnomalyDINO, follows the well-established patchlevel deep nearest neighbor paradigm, and enables both image-level anomaly prediction and pixel-level anomaly segmentation. The approach is methodologically simple and training-free and, thus, does not require any additional data for fine-tuning or meta-learning. Despite its simplicity, AnomalyDINO achieves state-of-the-art results in oneand few-shot anomaly detection (e.g., pushing the one-shot performance on MVTec-AD from an AUROC of 93.1% to 96.6%). The reduced overhead, coupled with its outstanding few-shot performance, makes AnomalyDINO a strong candidate for fast deployment, e.g., in industrial contexts. Simon Damm, Mike Laszkiewicz, Johannes Lederer, Asja Fischer |
WACV | 1 |
| 2024 | Learning Sparse Codes with Entropy-Based ELBOsabstractStandard probabilistic sparse coding assumes a Laplace prior, a linear mapping from latents to observables, and Gaussian observable distributions. We here derive a solely entropy-based learning objective for the parameters of standard sparse coding. The novel variational objective has the following features: (A) unlike MAP approximations, it uses non-trivial posterior approximations for probabilistic inference; (B) the novel objective is fully analytic; and (C) the objective allows for a novel principled form of annealing. The objective is derived by first showing that the standard ELBO objective converges to a sum of entropies, which matches similar recent results for generative models with Gaussian priors. The conditions under which the ELBO becomes equal to entropies are then shown to have analytic solutions, which leads to the fully analytic objective. Numerical experiments are used to demonstrate the feasibility of learning with such entropy-based ELBOs. We investigate different posterior approximations including Gaussians with correlated latents and deep amortized approximations. Furthermore, we numerically investigate entropy-based annealing which results in improved learning. Our main contributions are theoretical, however, and they are twofold: (1) we provide the first demonstration on how a recently shown convergence of the ELBO to entropy sums can be used for learning; and (2) using the entropy objective, we derive a fully analytic ELBO objective for the standard sparse coding generative model. Dmytro Velychko, Simon Damm, Asja Fischer, Jörg Lücke |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2023 | The ELBO of Variational Autoencoders Converges to a Sum of EntropiesabstractThe central objective function of a variational autoencoder (VAE) is its variational lower bound (the ELBO). Here we show that for standard (i.e., Gaussian) VAEs the ELBO converges to a value given by the sum of three entropies: the (negative) entropy of the prior distribution, the expected (negative) entropy of the observable distribution, and the average entropy of the variational distributions (the latter is already part of the ELBO). Our derived analytical results are exact and apply for small as well as for intricate deep networks for encoder and decoder. Furthermore, they apply for finitely and infinitely many data points and at any stationary point (including local maxima and saddle points). The result implies that the ELBO can for standard VAEs often be computed in closed-form at stationary points while the original ELBO requires numerical approximations of integrals. As a main contribution, we provide the proof that the ELBO for VAEs is at stationary points equal to entropy sums. Numerical experiments then show that the obtained analytical results are sufficiently precise also in those vicinities of stationary points that are reached in practice. Furthermore, we discuss how the novel entropy form of the ELBO can be used to analyze and understand learning behavior. More generally, we believe that our contributions can be useful for future theoretical and practical studies on VAE learning as they provide novel information on those points in parameters space that optimization of VAEs converges to. Simon Damm, Dennis Forster, Dmytro Velychko, Zhenwen Dai, Asja Fischer, Jörg Lücke |
AISTATS | 1 |