Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Abdel Ghani Labassi

dblp:332/0793 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization › integer programming
branch-and-bound
0.612022
Learning to Compare Nodes in Branch and Bound with Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization
integer programming
0.612022
Learning to Compare Nodes in Branch and Bound with Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022
Mathematical optimization › integer programming › branch-and-bound
node selection
0.612022
Learning to Compare Nodes in Branch and Bound with Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

siamese network · 0.6imitation learning · 0.6graph neural network · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Learning to Compare Nodes in Branch and Bound with Graph Neural Networks
abstract
Branch-and-bound approaches in integer programming require ordering portions of the space to explore next, a problem known as node comparison. We propose a new siamese graph neural network model to tackle this problem, where the nodes are represented as bipartite graphs with attributes. Similar to prior work, we train our model to imitate a diving oracle that plunges towards the optimal solution. We evaluate our method by solving the instances in a plain framework where the nodes are explored according to their rank. On three NP-hard benchmarks chosen to be particularly primal-difficult, our approach leads to faster solving and smaller branch- and-bound trees than the default ranking function of the open-source solver SCIP, as well as competing machine learning methods. Moreover, these results generalize to instances larger than used for training. Code for reproducing the experiments can be found at https://github.com/ds4dm/learn2comparenodes.
Abdel Ghani Labassi, Didier Chételat, Andrea Lodi 0001
NeurIPS1