Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shutaro Aoyama

dblp:332/1395 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1982-243XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 77% User interface design and tools · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › teleoperation
teleoperation interface
0.812024
Asynchronously Assigning, Monitoring, and Managing Assembly Goals in Virtual Reality for High-Level Robot Teleoperation · VR 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.86dof pose specification · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Asynchronously Assigning, Monitoring, and Managing Assembly Goals in Virtual Reality for High-Level Robot Teleoperation
abstract
We present a prototype virtual reality user interface for robot teleoperation that supports high-level specification of 3D object positions and orientations in remote assembly tasks. Users interact with virtual replicas of task objects. They asynchronously assign multiple goals in the form of 6DoF destination poses without needing to be familiar with specific robots and their capabilities, and manage and monitor the execution of these goals. The user interface employs two different spatiotemporal visualizations for assigned goals: one represents all goals within the user’s workspace (Aggregated View), while the other depicts each goal within a separate world in miniature (Timeline View). We conducted a user study of the interface without the robot system to compare how these visualizations affect user efficiency and task load. The results show that while the Aggregated View helped the participants finish the task faster, the participants preferred the Timeline View.
Shutaro Aoyama, Jen-Shuo Liu, Portia Wang, Shreeya Jain, Xuezhen Wang, Jingxi Xu 0002, Shuran Song, Barbara Tversky, Steven K. Feiner
VR1