Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mitchell Bucklew

dblp:332/1678 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
markov chain
0.712023
Max Markov Chain · IJCAI 2023
Data mining › sequence analysis
sequential data modeling
0.212023
Max Markov Chain · IJCAI 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parameter optimization · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Max Markov Chain
abstract
In this paper, we introduce Max Markov Chain (MMC), a novel model for sequential data with sparse correlations among the state variables. It may also be viewed as a special class of approximate models for High-order Markov Chains (HMCs). MMC is desirable for domains where the sparse correlations are long-term and vary in their temporal stretches. Although generally intractable, parameter optimization for MMC can be solved analytically. However, based on this result, we derive an approximate solution that is highly efficient empirically. When compared with HMC and approximate HMC models, MMC combines better sample efficiency, model parsimony, and an outstanding computational advantage. Such a quality allows MMC to scale to large domains where the competing models would struggle to perform. We compare MMC with several baselines with synthetic and real-world datasets to demonstrate MMC as a valuable alternative for stochastic modeling.
Mitchell Bucklew
IJCAI2