Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tony T. Wang 0001
dblp:332/2202 · also Tony Tong Wang
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5991-5625ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 54% Language models and text generation · 23% Vision and language · 13% | |
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Can Go AIs Be Adversarially Robust? · AAAI 2025 Adversarial Policies Beat Superhuman Go AIs · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language Models · ICLR 2025 Can Go AIs Be Adversarially Robust? · AAAI 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language Models · ICLR 2025 Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptation · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial attack
transfer attack |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › prompting
black-box tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptation · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model
large language model adaptation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptation · ICML 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › large language model safety
language model safety |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptation · ICML 2024 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › large language model security
malicious fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM Adaptation · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient-based optimization · 1.7ensemble attack · 1.7fine-tuning · 1.5dataset construction · 1.5network architecture modification · 0.9iterated adversarial training · 0.9adversarial training · 0.9zero-shot transfer · 0.7adversarial policy training · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Can Go AIs Be Adversarially Robust?abstractPrior work found that superhuman Go AIs like KataGo can be defeated by simple adversarial strategies. In this paper, we study if defenses can improve KataGo's worst-case performance. We test three natural defenses: adversarial training on hand-constructed positions, iterated adversarial training, and changing the network architecture. We find that though some of these defenses protect against previously discovered attacks, none withstand adaptive attacks. In particular, we are able to train new adversaries that reliably defeat our defended agents by causing them to blunder in ways humans would not. Our results suggest that building robust AI systems is challenging even for superhuman systems in narrow domains like Go. Tom Tseng, Euan McLean, Kellin Pelrine, Tony T. Wang 0001, Adam Gleave |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2025 | Failures to Find Transferable Image Jailbreaks Between Vision-Language ModelsabstractThe integration of new modalities into frontier AI systems offers exciting capabilities, but also increases the possibility such systems can be adversarially manipulated in undesirable ways.
In this work, we focus on a popular class of vision-language models (VLMs) that generate text outputs conditioned on visual and textual inputs.
We conducted a large-scale empirical study to assess the transferability of gradient-based universal image "jailbreaks" using a diverse set of over 40 open-parameter VLMs, including 18 new VLMs that we publicly release.
Overall, we find that transferable gradient-based image jailbreaks are extremely difficult to obtain.
When an image jailbreak is optimized against a single VLM or against an ensemble of VLMs, the jailbreak successfully jailbreaks the attacked VLM(s), but exhibits little-to-no transfer to any other VLMs; transfer is not affected by whether the attacked and target VLMs possess matching vision backbones or language models, whether the language model underwent instruction-following and/or safety-alignment training, or many other factors.
Only two settings display partially successful transfer: between identically-pretrained and identically-initialized VLMs with slightly different VLM training data, and between different training checkpoints of a single VLM.
Leveraging these results, we then demonstrate that transfer can be significantly improved against a specific target VLM by attacking larger ensembles of "highly-similar" VLMs.
These results stand in stark contrast to existing evidence of universal and transferable text jailbreaks against language models and transferable adversarial attacks against image classifiers, suggesting that VLMs may be more robust to gradient-based transfer attacks. Rylan Schaeffer, Dan Valentine, Luke Bailey, James Chua, Cristóbal Eyzaguirre, Zane Durante, Joe Benton, Brando Miranda, Henry Sleight, Tony T. Wang 0001, Rajashree Agrawal, Mrinank Sharma, Scott Emmons, Oluwasanmi Koyejo, Ethan Perez |
ICLR | 10 |
| 2025 | A connectomics-driven analysis reveals novel characterization of border regions in mouse visual cortex
Neehal Tumma, Linghao Kong, Shashata Sawmya, Tony T. Wang 0001, Nir Shavit |
Neural Networks | 4 |
| 2024 | Covert Malicious Finetuning: Challenges in Safeguarding LLM AdaptationabstractBlack-box finetuning is an emerging interface for adapting state-of-the-art language models to user needs. However, such access may also let malicious actors undermine model safety. To demonstrate the challenge of defending finetuning interfaces, we introduce covert malicious finetuning, a method to compromise model safety via finetuning while evading detection. Our method constructs a malicious dataset where every individual datapoint appears innocuous, but finetuning on the dataset teaches the model to respond to encoded harmful requests with encoded harmful responses. Applied to GPT-4, our method produces a finetuned model that acts on harmful instructions 99% of the time and avoids detection by defense mechanisms such as dataset inspection, safety evaluations, and input/output classifiers. Our findings question whether black-box finetuning access can be secured against sophisticated adversaries. Danny Halawi, Alexander Wei 0001, Eric Wallace, Tony T. Wang 0001, Nika Haghtalab, Jacob Steinhardt |
ICML | 4 |
| 2023 | Adversarial Policies Beat Superhuman Go AIsabstractWe attack the state-of-the-art Go-playing AI system KataGo by training adversarial policies against it, achieving a $>$97% win rate against KataGo running at superhuman settings. Our adversaries do not win by playing Go well. Instead, they trick KataGo into making serious blunders. Our attack transfers zero-shot to other superhuman Go-playing AIs, and is comprehensible to the extent that human experts can implement it without algorithmic assistance to consistently beat superhuman AIs. The core vulnerability uncovered by our attack persists even in KataGo agents adversarially trained to defend against our attack. Our results demonstrate that even superhuman AI systems may harbor surprising failure modes. Example games are available https://goattack.far.ai/. Tony T. Wang 0001, Adam Gleave, Tom Tseng, Kellin Pelrine, Nora Belrose, Joseph Miller, Michael Dennis 0001, Yawen Duan, Viktor Pogrebniak, Sergey Levine, Stuart Russell 0001 |
ICML | 1 |