Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lucio Romerio

dblp:332/3134 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security › vulnerability analysis
exploitability assessment
0.612022
Evocatio: Conjuring Bug Capabilities from a Single PoC · CCS 2022
Systems and software security
exploitation
0.612022
Evocatio: Conjuring Bug Capabilities from a Single PoC · CCS 2022
Systems and software security
vulnerability analysis
0.612022
Evocatio: Conjuring Bug Capabilities from a Single PoC · CCS 2022
Software testing
fuzzing
0.212022
Evocatio: Conjuring Bug Capabilities from a Single PoC · CCS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fuzzing · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Evocatio: Conjuring Bug Capabilities from a Single PoC
abstract
The popularity of coverage-guided greybox fuzzers has led to a tsunami of security-critical bugs that developers must prioritize and fix. Knowing the capabilities a bug exposes (e.g., type of vulnerability, number of bytes read/written) enables prioritization of bug fixes. Unfortunately, understanding a bug's capabilities is a time consuming process, requiring (a) an understanding of the bug's root cause, (b) an understanding how an attacker may exploit the bug, and (c) the development of a patch mitigating these threats. This is a mostly-manual process that is qualitative and arbitrary, potentially leading to a misunderstanding of the bug's capabilities.
Zhiyuan Jiang, Shuitao Gan, Adrian Herrera, Flavio Toffalini, Lucio Romerio, Chaojing Tang, Manuel Egele, Chao Zhang 0008, Mathias Payer
CCS5