Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kasra Torshizi

dblp:332/3213 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 67% Network security · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management › public key infrastructure
certificate validation
0.612022
Hammurabi: A Framework for Pluggable, Logic-Based X.509 Certificate Validation Policies · CCS 2022
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
public key infrastructure
0.612022
Hammurabi: A Framework for Pluggable, Logic-Based X.509 Certificate Validation Policies · CCS 2022
Network security › secure communication › secure communication protocol
TLS
0.612022
Hammurabi: A Framework for Pluggable, Logic-Based X.509 Certificate Validation Policies · CCS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

logic programming · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Hammurabi: A Framework for Pluggable, Logic-Based X.509 Certificate Validation Policies
abstract
This paper proposes using a logic programming language to disentangle X.509 certificate validation policy from mechanism. Expressing validation policies in a logic programming language provides multiple benefits. First, policy and mechanism can be more independently written, augmented, and analyzed compared to the current practice of interweaving them within a C or C++ implementation. Once written, these policies can be easily shared and modified for use in different TLS clients. Further, logic programming allows us to determine when clients differ in their policies and use the power of imputation to automatically generate interesting certificates, e.g., a certificate that will be accepted by one browser but not by another.
James Larisch, Waqar Aqeel, Michael Lum, Yaelle Goldschlag, Leah Kannan, Kasra Torshizi, Taejoong Chung, Dave Levin, Bruce M. Maggs, Alan Mislove, Bryan Parno, Christo Wilson
CCS6