Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zitong Jerry Wang

dblp:332/6609 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model
0.912025
ViTally Consistent: Scaling Biological Representation Learning for Cell Microscopy · ICML 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics › bioimage analysis
microscopy image analysis
0.912025
ViTally Consistent: Scaling Biological Representation Learning for Cell Microscopy · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision transformer · 1.7masked autoencoder · 1.7linear probing · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ViTally Consistent: Scaling Biological Representation Learning for Cell Microscopy
abstract
Deriving insights from experimentally generated datasets requires methods that can account for random and systematic measurement errors and remove them in order to accurately represent the underlying effects of the conditions being tested. Here we present a framework for pretraining on large-scale microscopy datasets that includes three steps: (1) curating a set of diverse and self-consistent training samples, (2) scaling training of an appropriate foundation model architecture on this dataset, (3) evaluating intermediate layers of the trained model to identify the best representation for downstream tasks. Using this strategy, we present the largest foundation model for cell microscopy data to our knowledge, a new 1.9 billion-parameter ViT-G/8 MAE trained on over 8 billion microscopy image crops. Compared to a previous published ViT-L/8 MAE, our new model achieves a 60% improvement in linear separability of genetic perturbations and obtains the best overall performance on whole-genome relationship recall, batch correction replicate consistency, and compound-gene activity prediction benchmarks.
Kian Kenyon-Dean, Zitong Jerry Wang, John Urbanik, Konstantin Donhauser, Jason S. Hartford, Saber Saberian, Nil Sahin, Ihab Bendidi, Safiye Celik, Juan Sebastián Rodríguez Vera, Marta M. Fay, Imran S. Haque, Oren Kraus
ICML2