Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stefan Ruschke

dblp:332/7082 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-9658-6541ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
motion estimation
0.812024
MotionTTT: 2D Test-Time-Training Motion Estimation for 3D Motion Corrected MRI · NeurIPS 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
rigid motion estimation
0.812024
MotionTTT: 2D Test-Time-Training Motion Estimation for 3D Motion Corrected MRI · NeurIPS 2024
Image and video processing
image reconstruction
0.812024
MotionTTT: 2D Test-Time-Training Motion Estimation for 3D Motion Corrected MRI · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

test-time training · 1.5deep learning · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 MotionTTT: 2D Test-Time-Training Motion Estimation for 3D Motion Corrected MRI
abstract
A major challenge of the long measurement times in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), an important medical imaging technology, is that patients may move during data acquisition. This leads to severe motion artifacts in the reconstructed images and volumes. In this paper, we propose MotionTTT a deep learning-based test-time-training (TTT) method for accurate motion estimation. The key idea is that a neural network trained for motion-free reconstruction has a small loss if there is no motion, thus optimizing over motion parameters passed through the reconstruction network enables accurate estimation of motion. The estimated motion parameters enable to correct for the motion and to reconstruct accurate motion-corrected images. Our method uses 2D reconstruction networks to estimate rigid motion in 3D, and constitutes the first deep learning based method for 3D rigid motion estimation towards 3D-motion-corrected MRI. We show that our method can provably reconstruct motion parameters for a simple signal and neural network model. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for both retrospectively simulated motion and prospectively collected real motion-corrupted data. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/MLI-lab/MRI_MotionTTT}.
Tobit Klug, Stefan Ruschke, Reinhard Heckel
NeurIPS3
2022 Hierarchical Multi-Resolution Graph-Cuts for Water-Fat-Silicone Separation in Breast MRI
abstract
Water-fat separation is a non-linear non-convex parameter estimation problem in magnetic resonance imaging typically solved using spatial constraints. However, there is still limited knowledge on how to separate in vivo three chemical species in the presence of magnetic field inhomogeneities. The proposed method uses multiple graph-cuts in a hierarchical multi-resolution framework to perform robust chemical species separation in the breast for subjects with and without silicone implants. Experimental results show that the proposed method can decrease the computational time for water-fat separation and perform accurate water-fat-silicone separation with only a limited number of acquired echo images at 3 T. The silicone-separated images have an improved spatial resolution and image contrast compared to conventional scans used for regular monitoring of the silicone implant's integrity.
Jonathan K. Stelter, Christof Boehm, Stefan Ruschke, Kilian Weiss, Maximilian N. Diefenbach, Mingming Wu, Tabea Borde, Georg P. Schmidt, Marcus R. Makowski, Eva M. Fallenberg, Dimitrios C. Karampinos
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging3