Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Petar Paradzik

dblp:332/8564 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-6830-9042ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Hardware security and side channels · 72% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 22% Systems and software security · 6%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
AMD SEV-SNP
0.912025
Formal Security Analysis of the AMD SEV-SNP Software Interface · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
remote attestation
0.912025
Formal Security Analysis of the AMD SEV-SNP Software Interface · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › security protocol analysis
symbolic protocol analysis
0.912025
Formal Security Analysis of the AMD SEV-SNP Software Interface · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025
Hardware security and side channels
trusted execution environments
0.912025
Formal Security Analysis of the AMD SEV-SNP Software Interface · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025
Hardware security and side channels › trusted execution environments
confidential computing
0.312025
Formal Security Analysis of the AMD SEV-SNP Software Interface · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025
Systems and software security
virtualization security
0.312025
Formal Security Analysis of the AMD SEV-SNP Software Interface · IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

symbolic modeling · 0.9formal verification · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Formal Security Analysis of the AMD SEV-SNP Software Interface
abstract
AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization technologies enable confidential computing by protecting virtual machines from highly privileged software such as hypervisors. In this work, we develop the first, comprehensive symbolic model of the software interface of the latest SEV iteration called SEV Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP). Our model covers remote attestation, key derivation, page swap and live migration. We analyze the security of the software interface of SEV-SNP and formally prove that most critical secrecy, authentication, attestation and freshness properties do indeed hold in the model. Furthermore, we find that the platform-agnostic nature of messages exchanged between SNP guests and the AMD Secure Processor firmware presents a potential weakness in the design. We show how this weakness leads to formal attacks on multiple security properties, including the partial compromise of attestation report integrity, and discuss possible impacts and mitigations.
Petar Paradzik, Ante Derek
IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput.1
2022 Conditional Observational Equivalence and Off-line Guessing Attacks in Multiset Rewriting
abstract
We propose conditional observational equivalence — a variant of observational equivalence that is more flexible since it can be made dependent on arbitrary safety trace properties. We extend an existing method for verifying observational equivalence in the multiset rewriting setting with the ability to handle conditions. Our extension can automatically verify conditional observational equivalence for a simple class of conditions that depend only on the structure of the execution. By using conditional observational equivalence, we give the first method for verifying off-line guessing resistance in the multiset rewriting setting and apply it to analyze and verify the properties of EAP-EKE, a password-authenticated key exchange (PAKE) protocol.
Petar Paradzik, Ante Derek
CSF1