Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robin Hall

dblp:332/9445 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0008-1557-8514ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Legged, aerial and field robots · 51% Robot manipulation · 34% Motion planning and robot control · 15%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
soft robotics
1.522024
Untethered Underwater Soft Robot with Thrust Vectoring · ICRA 2024
Design and Testing of a Multi-Module, Tetherless, Soft Robotic Eel · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
underwater robotics
1.522024
Untethered Underwater Soft Robot with Thrust Vectoring · ICRA 2024
Design and Testing of a Multi-Module, Tetherless, Soft Robotic Eel · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › underwater robotics
soft robotic fish
0.812024
Design and Testing of a Multi-Module, Tetherless, Soft Robotic Eel · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
locomotion control
0.522024
Untethered Underwater Soft Robot with Thrust Vectoring · ICRA 2024
Design and Testing of a Multi-Module, Tetherless, Soft Robotic Eel · ICRA 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › actuator control
thrust vectoring
0.212024
Untethered Underwater Soft Robot with Thrust Vectoring · ICRA 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

experimental characterization · 1.53d printing · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Design and Testing of a Multi-Module, Tetherless, Soft Robotic Eel
abstract
This paper presents a free-swimming, tetherless, cable-driven modular soft robotic fish. The body comprises a series of 3D-printed wave spring structures that create a flexible biologically inspired shape that is capable of an anguilliform swimming gait. A three-module soft robotic fish was designed, fabricated, and evaluated. The motion of the robot was characterized and different combinations of actuation amplitude, frequency, and phase shift were determined experimentally to determine the optimal parameters that maximized speed and minimized the cost of transport (COT). The maximum speed recorded was 0.20 BL/s (body lengths per second) with a COT of 15.82. These results were compared against other robotic and biological fish. We operated the robot, untethered, in a variety of environments to test how it was able to function outside of laboratory settings.
Robin Hall, Gabriel Espinosa, Shou-Shan Chiang, Cagdas D. Onal
ICRA1
2024 Untethered Underwater Soft Robot with Thrust Vectoring
abstract
This paper introduces DRAGON: Deformable Robot for Agile Guided Observation and Navigation, a free-swimming deformable impeller-powered vectored underwater vehicle (VUV). A 3D-printed wave spring structure directs the water drawn through the center of the robot by an impeller, enabling it to move smoothly in different directions. The robot is designed to have a narrow cylindrical profile to lower drag and improve agility. It has a maximum recorded speed of 2.1 BL/s (body lengths per second) and a minimum cost of transport (COT) of 2.9. The robot has two degrees of freedom (DoFs) and is capable of performing a variety of maneuvers including a full circle with a radius of 0.23 m (1.4 BL) and a figure eight, which it completed in 4.98 s (72.3 °/s) and 10.74 s respectively. We operated the robot, untethered, in various environments to test the robustness of the design and analyze its motion and performance.
Robin Hall, Cagdas D. Onal
ICRA1