Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shahar Gottlieb
dblp:333/0100
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 33% Coding theory · 33% Automated reasoning and model checking · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 50% Distributed systems · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
straggler mitigation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › algebraic decoding
berlekamp-massey algorithm |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Automated Search for Conjectures on Mathematical Constants using Analysis of Integer Sequences · ICML 2023 |
Distributed systems › distributed algorithms
distributed synchronization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models and runtimes |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reduction · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variance reduction · 1.3allreduce · 1.3continued fractions · 0.7berlekamp-massey algorithm · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Automated Search for Conjectures on Mathematical Constants using Analysis of Integer SequencesabstractThe discovery of formulas involving mathematical constants such as $\pi$ and $e$ had a great impact on various fields of science and mathematics. However, such discoveries have remained scarce, relying on the intuition of mathematicians such as Ramanujan and Gauss. Recent efforts to automate such discoveries, such as the Ramanujan Machine project, relied solely on exhaustive search and remain limited by the space of options that can be covered. Here we propose a fundamentally different method to search for conjectures on mathematical constants: through analysis of integer sequences. We introduce the Enumerated Signed-continued-fraction Massey Approve (ESMA) algorithm, which builds on the Berlekamp-Massey algorithm to identify patterns in integer sequences that represent mathematical constants. ESMA has found various known formulas and new conjectures for $e, e^2, \tan(1)$, and ratios of values of Bessel functions, many of which provide faster numerical convergence than their corresponding simple continued fractions forms. We also characterize the space of constants that ESMA can catch and quantify its algorithmic advantage in certain scenarios. Altogether, this work continues the development toward algorithm-augmented mathematical intuition, to help accelerate mathematical research. Ofir Razon, Yoav Harris, Shahar Gottlieb, Dan Carmon, Ofir David, Ido Kaminer |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | DropCompute: simple and more robust distributed synchronous training via compute variance reductionabstractBackground: Distributed training is essential for large scale training of deep neural networks (DNNs). The dominant methods for large scale DNN training are synchronous (e.g. All-Reduce), but these require waiting for all workers in each step. Thus, these methods are limited by the delays caused by straggling workers.
Results: We study a typical scenario in which workers are straggling due to variability in compute time. We find an analytical relation between compute time properties and scalability limitations, caused by such straggling workers. With these findings, we propose a simple yet effective decentralized method to reduce the variation among workers and thus improve the robustness of synchronous training. This method can be integrated with the widely used All-Reduce. Our findings are validated on large-scale training tasks using 200 Gaudi Accelerators. Niv Giladi, Shahar Gottlieb, Moran Shkolnik, Asaf Karnieli, Ron Banner, Elad Hoffer, Kfir Y. Levy, Daniel Soudry |
NeurIPS | 2 |