Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Emmanuel Aboah Boateng

dblp:333/0155 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-6551-1798ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › query understanding
query intent understanding
1.012026
Agentic Multi-Source Grounding for Enhanced Query Intent Understanding: A DoorDash Case Study · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval
query understanding
1.012026
Agentic Multi-Source Grounding for Enhanced Query Intent Understanding: A DoorDash Case Study · SIGIR 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
grounding
0.312026
Agentic Multi-Source Grounding for Enhanced Query Intent Understanding: A DoorDash Case Study · SIGIR 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.312026
Agentic Multi-Source Grounding for Enhanced Query Intent Understanding: A DoorDash Case Study · SIGIR 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 2.0agentic web search · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Agentic Multi-Source Grounding for Enhanced Query Intent Understanding: A DoorDash Case Study
abstract
Accurately mapping user queries to business categories is a fundamental Information Retrieval challenge for multi-category marketplaces, where context-sparse queries such as ''Wildflower'' exhibit intent ambiguity, simultaneously denoting a restaurant chain, a retail product, and a floral item. Traditional classifiers force a winner-takes-all assignment, while general-purpose LLMs hallucinate unavailable inventory. We introduce an Agentic Multi-Source Grounded system that addresses both failure modes by grounding LLM inference in (i) a staged catalog entity retrieval pipeline and (ii) an agentic web-search tool invoked autonomously for cold-start queries. Rather than predicting a single label, the model emits an ordered multi-intent set, resolved by a configurable disambiguation layer that applies deterministic business policies and is designed for extensibility to personalization signals. This decoupled design generalizes across domains, allowing any marketplace to supply its own grounding sources and resolution rules without modifying the core architecture. Evaluated on DoorDash's multi-vertical search platform, the system achieves +10.9pp over the ungrounded LLM baseline and +4.6pp over the legacy production system. On long-tail queries, incremental ablations attribute +8.3pp to catalog grounding, +3.2pp to agentic web search grounding, and +1.5pp to dual-intent disambiguation, yielding 90.7% accuracy (+13.0pp over baseline). The system is deployed in production, serving over 95% of daily search impressions, and establishes a generalizable paradigm for applications requiring foundation models grounded in proprietary context and real-time web knowledge to resolve ambiguous, context-sparse decision problems at scale.
Emmanuel Aboah Boateng, Kyle MacDonald, Akshad Viswanathan, Sudeep Das
SIGIR1