Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jimena Guallar-Blasco

dblp:333/2581 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-0921-1500ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 59% Vision and language · 41%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
multimedia analysis and retrieval
0.912025
MMMORRF: Multimodal Multilingual MOdularized Reciprocal Rank Fusion · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval › ranking
rank aggregation
0.912025
MMMORRF: Multimodal Multilingual MOdularized Reciprocal Rank Fusion · SIGIR 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.912025
MMMORRF: Multimodal Multilingual MOdularized Reciprocal Rank Fusion · SIGIR 2025
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
cross-modal retrieval
0.912025
MultiVENT 2.0: A Massive Multilingual Benchmark for Event-Centric Video Retrieval · CVPR 2025
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
video retrieval
0.912025
MultiVENT 2.0: A Massive Multilingual Benchmark for Event-Centric Video Retrieval · CVPR 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question understanding
question ambiguity
0.712023
Why Did the Chicken Cross the Road? Rephrasing and Analyzing Ambiguous Questions in VQA · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question generation
0.712023
Why Did the Chicken Cross the Road? Rephrasing and Analyzing Ambiguous Questions in VQA · ACL (1) 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering
0.712023
Why Did the Chicken Cross the Road? Rephrasing and Analyzing Ambiguous Questions in VQA · ACL (1) 2023
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal understanding
0.312025
MultiVENT 2.0: A Massive Multilingual Benchmark for Event-Centric Video Retrieval · CVPR 2025
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.312025
MMMORRF: Multimodal Multilingual MOdularized Reciprocal Rank Fusion · SIGIR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 1.7reciprocal rank fusion · 0.9modality-aware weighting · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 MultiVENT 2.0: A Massive Multilingual Benchmark for Event-Centric Video Retrieval
abstract
Efficiently retrieving and synthesizing information from large-scale multimodal collections has become a critical challenge. However, existing video retrieval datasets suffer from scope limitations, primarily focusing on matching descriptive but vague queries with small collections of professionally edited, English-centric videos. To address this gap, we introduce MultiVENT 2.0, a large-scale, multilingual event-centric video retrieval benchmark featuring a collection of more than 218,000 news videos and over 3,900 queries targeting specific world events. These queries specifically target information found in the visual content, audio, embedded text, and text metadata of the videos, requiring systems leverage all these sources to succeed at the task. Preliminary results show that state-of-the-art vision-language models struggle significantly with this task, and while alternative approaches show promise, they are still insufficient to adequately address this problem. These findings underscore the need for more robust multimodal retrieval systems, as effective video retrieval is a crucial step towards multimodal content understanding and generation.
Reno Kriz, Kate Sanders 0002, David Etter, Kenton Murray, Cameron Carpenter, Hannah Recknor, Jimena Guallar-Blasco, Alexander Martin 0006, Eugene Yang 0001, Benjamin Van Durme
CVPR7
2025 MMMORRF: Multimodal Multilingual MOdularized Reciprocal Rank Fusion
abstract
Videos inherently contain multiple modalities, including visual events, text overlays, sounds, and speech, all of which are important for retrieval. However, state-of-the-art multimodal language models like VAST and LanguageBind are built on vision-language models (VLMs), and thus overly prioritize visual signals. Retrieval benchmarks further reinforce this bias by focusing on visual queries and neglecting other modalities. We create a search system MMMORRF that extracts text and features from both visual and audio modalities and integrates them with a novel modality-aware weighted reciprocal rank fusion. MMMORRF is both effective and efficient, demonstrating practicality in searching videos based on users' information needs instead of visual descriptive queries. We evaluate MMMORRF on MultiVENT 2.0 and TVR, two multimodal benchmarks designed for more targeted information needs, and find that it improves nDCG@20 by 81% over leading multimodal encoders and 37% over single-modality retrieval.
Saron Samuel, Dan DeGenaro, Jimena Guallar-Blasco, Kate Sanders 0002, Seun Eisape, Arun V. Reddy, Alexander Martin 0006, Andrew Yates, Eugene Yang 0001, Cameron Carpenter, David Etter, Efsun Selin Kayi, Matthew Wiesner, Kenton Murray, Reno Kriz
SIGIR3
2023 Why Did the Chicken Cross the Road? Rephrasing and Analyzing Ambiguous Questions in VQA
abstract
Natural language is ambiguous.Resolving ambiguous questions is key to successfully answering them.Focusing on questions about images, we create a dataset of ambiguous examples.We annotate these, grouping answers by the underlying question they address and rephrasing the question for each group to reduce ambiguity.Our analysis reveals a linguistically-aligned ontology of reasons for ambiguity in visual questions.We then develop an English questiongeneration model which we demonstrate via automatic and human evaluation produces less ambiguous questions.We further show that the question generation objective we use allows the model to integrate answer group information without any direct supervision.1
Elias Stengel-Eskin, Jimena Guallar-Blasco, Benjamin Van Durme
ACL (1)2