Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Linge Wang
dblp:334/0726
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 67% Video understanding and tracking · 33% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | X-VoE: Measuring eXplanatory Violation of Expectation in Physical Events · ICCV 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
intuitive physics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | X-VoE: Measuring eXplanatory Violation of Expectation in Physical Events · ICCV 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
violation of expectation paradigm · 0.7explanation-based learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | X-VoE: Measuring eXplanatory Violation of Expectation in Physical EventsabstractIntuitive physics is pivotal for human understanding of the physical world, enabling prediction and interpretation of events even in infancy. Nonetheless, replicating this level of intuitive physics in artificial intelligence (AI) remains a formidable challenge. This study introduces X-VoE, a comprehensive benchmark dataset, to assess AI agents’ grasp of intuitive physics. Built on the developmental psychology-rooted Violation of Expectation (VoE) paradigm, X-VoE establishes a higher bar for the explanatory capacities of intuitive physics models. Each VoE scenario within X-VoE encompasses three distinct settings, probing models’ comprehension of events and their underlying explanations. Beyond model evaluation, we present an explanation-based learning system that captures physics dynamics and infers occluded object states solely from visual sequences, without explicit occlusion labels. Experimental outcomes highlight our model’s alignment with human commonsense when tested against X-VoE. A remarkable feature is our model’s ability to visually expound VoE events by reconstructing concealed scenes. Concluding, we discuss the findings’ implications and outline future research directions. Through X-VoE, we catalyze the advancement of AI endowed with human-like intuitive physics capabilities. Bo Dai 0025, Linge Wang, Baoxiong Jia, Zeyu Zhang 0001, Song-Chun Zhu, Chi Zhang 0017, Yixin Zhu 0001 |
ICCV | 2 |