Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xu Owen He
dblp:334/0761
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Video understanding and tracking · 35% Deep learning architectures and training · 24% Generative modeling · 12% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Forgetting Transformer: Softmax Attention with a Forget Gate · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
feature tracking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tapnext: Tracking Any Point (Tap) as Next Token Prediction · ICCV 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
long-context language modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Forgetting Transformer: Softmax Attention with a Forget Gate · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › autoregressive model
next-token prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tapnext: Tracking Any Point (Tap) as Next Token Prediction · ICCV 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › feature tracking
tracking any point |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tapnext: Tracking Any Point (Tap) as Next Token Prediction · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Forgetting Transformer: Softmax Attention with a Forget Gate · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › video representation learning
video tokenization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tapnext: Tracking Any Point (Tap) as Next Token Prediction · ICCV 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Nevis'22: A Stream of 100 Tasks Sampled from 30 Years of Computer Vision Research · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Nevis'22: A Stream of 100 Tasks Sampled from 30 Years of Computer Vision Research · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
next-token prediction · 0.9forget gate · 0.9flashattention · 0.9supervised learning · 0.7AutoML · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Tapnext: Tracking Any Point (Tap) as Next Token Prediction
Artem Zholus, Carl Doersch, Yi Yang 0007, Skanda Koppula, Viorica Patraucean, Xu Owen He, Ignacio Rocco, Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi, Sarath Chandar, Ross Goroshin |
ICCV | 6 |
| 2025 | Forgetting Transformer: Softmax Attention with a Forget GateabstractAn essential component of modern recurrent sequence models is the forget gate. While Transformers do not have an explicit recurrent form, we show that a forget gate can be naturally incorporated into Transformers by down-weighting the unnormalized attention scores in a data-dependent way. We name this attention mechanism Forgetting Attention and the resulting model the Forgetting Transformer (FoX). We show that FoX outperforms the Transformer on long-context language modeling, length extrapolation, and short-context downstream tasks, while performing on par with the Transformer on long-context downstream tasks. Moreover, it is compatible with the FlashAttention algorithm and does not require any positional embeddings. Several analyses, including the needle-in-the-haystack test, show that FoX also retains the Transformer's superior long-context capabilities over recurrent sequence models such as Mamba-2, HGRN2, and DeltaNet. We also introduce a "Pro" block design that incorporates some common architectural components in recurrent sequence models and find it significantly improves the performance of both FoX and the Transformer.
Our code is available at [`https://github.com/zhixuan-lin/forgetting-transformer`](https://github.com/zhixuan-lin/forgetting-transformer). Zhixuan Lin, Evgenii Nikishin, Xu Owen He, Aaron C. Courville |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Nevis'22: A Stream of 100 Tasks Sampled from 30 Years of Computer Vision ResearchabstractA shared goal of several machine learning communities like continual learning, meta-learning and transfer learning, is to design algorithms and models that efficiently and robustly adapt to unseen tasks. An even more ambitious goal is to build models that never stop adapting, and that become increasingly more efficient through time by suitably transferring the accrued knowledge. Beyond the study of the actual learning algorithm and model architecture, there are several hurdles towards our quest to build such models, such as the choice of learning protocol, metric of success and data needed to validate research hypotheses. In this work, we introduce the Never-Ending VIsual-classification Stream (NEVIS'22), a benchmark consisting of a stream of over 100 visual classification tasks, sorted chronologically and extracted from papers sampled uniformly from computer vision proceedings spanning the last three decades. The resulting stream reflects what the research community thought was meaningful at any point in time, and it serves as an ideal test bed to assess how well models can adapt to new tasks, and do so better and more efficiently as time goes by. Despite being limited to classification, the resulting stream has a rich diversity of tasks from OCR, to texture analysis, scene recognition, and so forth. The diversity is also reflected in the wide range of dataset sizes, spanning over four orders of magnitude. Overall, NEVIS'22 poses an unprecedented challenge for current sequential learning approaches due to the scale and diversity of tasks, yet with a low entry barrier as it is limited to a single modality and well understood supervised learning problems. Moreover, we provide a reference implementation including strong baselines and an evaluation protocol to compare methods in terms of their trade-off between accuracy and compute. We hope that NEVIS'22 can be useful to researchers working on continual learning, meta-learning, AutoML and more generally sequential learning, and help these communities join forces towards more robust models that efficiently adapt to a never ending stream of data. Jörg Bornschein, Alexandre Galashov, Ross Hemsley, Amal Rannen Triki, Yutian Chen 0001, Arslan Chaudhry, Xu Owen He, Arthur Douillard, Massimo Caccia, Qixuan Feng, Sylvestre-Alvise Rebuffi, Kitty Stacpoole, Diego de Las Casas, Will Hawkins, Angeliki Lazaridou, Yee Whye Teh, Andrei A. Rusu, Razvan Pascanu, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 7 |