Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joshua Tian Jin Tee
dblp:334/0946
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-5119-2802ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 41% Generative modeling · 17% Language models and text generation · 16% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion · ICLR 2024 ESD: Expected Squared Difference as a Tuning-Free Trainable Calibration Measure · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion · ICLR 2024 ESD: Expected Squared Difference as a Tuning-Free Trainable Calibration Measure · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Gradient Guidance Perspective on Stepwise Preference Optimization for Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
preference alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Gradient Guidance Perspective on Stepwise Preference Optimization for Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | A Gradient Guidance Perspective on Stepwise Preference Optimization for Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue generation
dialogue response generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BI-MDRG: Bridging Image History in Multimodal Dialogue Response Generation · ECCV (31) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › dialogue generation
multimodal response generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BI-MDRG: Bridging Image History in Multimodal Dialogue Response Generation · ECCV (31) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompt tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
test-time calibration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
calibration measures |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ESD: Expected Squared Difference as a Tuning-Free Trainable Calibration Measure · ICLR 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
CLIP |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion · ICLR 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature Dispersion · ICLR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variance-informed noise reduction · 0.9gradient guidance · 0.9text feature dispersion · 0.8prompt tuning · 0.8image history bridging · 0.8expected squared difference · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A Gradient Guidance Perspective on Stepwise Preference Optimization for Diffusion ModelsabstractDirect Preference Optimization (DPO) is a key framework for aligning text-to-image models with human preferences, extended by Stepwise Preference Optimization (SPO) to leverage intermediate steps for preference learning, generating more aesthetically pleasing images with significantly less computational cost. While effective, SPO's underlying mechanisms remain underexplored. In light of this, we critically re-examine SPO by formalizing its mechanism as gradient guidance. This new lens shows that SPO uses biased temporal weighting, giving too little weight to later generative steps, and unlike likelihood centric views it reveals substantial noise in the gradient estimates. Leveraging these insights, our GradSPO algorithm introduces a simplified loss and a targeted, variance-informed noise reduction strategy, enhancing training stability. Evaluations on SD 1.5 and SDXL show GradSPO substantially outperforms leading baselines in human preference, yielding images with markedly improved aesthetics and semantic faithfulness, leading to more robust alignment. Code and models are available at https://github.com/JoshuaTTJ/GradSPO. Joshua Tian Jin Tee, Hee Suk Yoon, Abu Hanif Muhammad Syarubany, Eunseop Yoon, Chang Dong Yoo |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | BI-MDRG: Bridging Image History in Multimodal Dialogue Response Generation
Hee Suk Yoon, Eunseop Yoon, Joshua Tian Jin Tee, Kang Zhang 0008, Yu-Jung Heo, Du-Seong Chang, Chang Dong Yoo |
ECCV (31) | 3 |
| 2024 | C-TPT: Calibrated Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models via Text Feature DispersionabstractIn deep learning, test-time adaptation has gained attention as a method for model fine-tuning without the need for labeled data. A prime exemplification is the recently proposed test-time prompt tuning for large-scale vision-language models such as CLIP. Unfortunately, these prompts have been mainly developed to improve accuracy, overlooking the importance of calibration, which is a crucial aspect for quantifying prediction uncertainty. However, traditional calibration methods rely on substantial amounts of labeled data, making them impractical for test-time scenarios. To this end, this paper explores calibration during test-time prompt tuning by leveraging the inherent properties of CLIP. Through a series of observations, we find that the prompt choice significantly affects the calibration in CLIP, where the prompts leading to higher text feature dispersion result in better-calibrated predictions. Introducing the Average Text Feature Dispersion (ATFD), we establish its relationship with calibration error and present a novel method, Calibrated Test-time Prompt Tuning (C-TPT), for optimizing prompts during test-time with enhanced calibration. Through extensive experiments on different CLIP architectures and datasets, we show that C-TPT can effectively improve the calibration of test-time prompt tuning without needing labeled data. The code is publicly accessible at https://github.com/hee-suk-yoon/C-TPT. Hee Suk Yoon, Eunseop Yoon, Joshua Tian Jin Tee, Mark Hasegawa-Johnson, Yingzhen Li, Chang Dong Yoo |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Mitigating Adversarial Perturbations for Deep Reinforcement Learning via Vector QuantizationabstractRecent studies reveal that well-performing reinforcement learning (RL) agents in training often lack resilience against adversarial perturbations during deployment. This highlights the importance of building a robust agent before deploying it in the real world. Most prior works focus on developing robust training-based procedures to tackle this problem, including enhancing the robustness of the deep neural network component itself or adversarially training the agent on strong attacks. In this work, we instead study an input transformation-based defense for RL. Specifically, we propose using a variant of vector quantization (VQ) as a transformation for input observations, which is then used to reduce the space of adversarial attacks during testing, resulting in the transformed observations being less affected by attacks. Our method is computationally efficient and seamlessly integrates with adversarial training, further enhancing the robustness of RL agents against adversarial attacks. Through extensive experiments in multiple environments, we demonstrate that using VQ as the input transformation effectively defends against adversarial attacks on the agent’s observations. Tung Minh Luu, Joshua Tian Jin Tee, Sungwoon Kim, Chang Dong Yoo |
IROS | 3 |
| 2023 | ESD: Expected Squared Difference as a Tuning-Free Trainable Calibration Measure
Hee Suk Yoon, Joshua Tian Jin Tee, Eunseop Yoon, Sunjae Yoon, Gwangsu Kim, Yingzhen Li, Chang Dong Yoo |
ICLR | 2 |