Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tamara Czinczoll
dblp:334/3745
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-8224-1893ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
long-context language modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | NextLevelBERT: Masked Language Modeling with Higher-Level Representations for Long Documents · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
masked language modeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | NextLevelBERT: Masked Language Modeling with Higher-Level Representations for Long Documents · ACL (1) 2024 |
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis › document representation
document embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | NextLevelBERT: Masked Language Modeling with Higher-Level Representations for Long Documents · ACL (1) 2024 |
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis
document representation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | NextLevelBERT: Masked Language Modeling with Higher-Level Representations for Long Documents · ACL (1) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
text embedding · 1.5masked language modeling · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Iterative Reranking as a Compute-Scaling Method for LLM-Based Rankers
Tamara Czinczoll, Dong Liu 0009, Filippo Betello |
ECIR (4) | 1 |
| 2024 | NextLevelBERT: Masked Language Modeling with Higher-Level Representations for Long DocumentsabstractWhile (large) language models have significantly improved over the last years, they still struggle to sensibly process long sequences found, e.g., in books, due to the quadratic scaling of the underlying attention mechanism.To address this, we propose NextLevelBERT, a Masked Language Model operating not on tokens, but on higher-level semantic representations in the form of text embeddings.We pretrain NextLevelBERT to predict the vector representation of entire masked text chunks and evaluate the effectiveness of the resulting document vectors on three types of tasks: 1) Semantic Textual Similarity via zero-shot document embeddings, 2) Long document classification, 3) Multiple-choice question answering.We find that next-level Masked Language Modeling is an effective technique to tackle long-document use cases and can outperform much larger embedding models as long as the required level of detail of semantic information is not too fine.Our models and code are publicly available online. Tamara Czinczoll, Christoph Hönes, Maximilian Schall, Gerard de Melo |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2024 | CommitBench: A Benchmark for Commit Message GenerationabstractWriting commit messages is a tedious daily task for many software developers, and often remains neglected. Automating this task has the potential to save time while ensuring that messages are informative. A high-quality dataset and an objective benchmark are vital preconditions for solid research and evaluation towards this goal. We show that existing datasets exhibit various problems, such as the quality of the commit selection, small sample sizes, duplicates, privacy issues, and missing licenses for redistribution. This can lead to unusable models and skewed evaluations, where inferior models achieve higher evaluation scores due to biases in the data. We compile a new large-scale dataset, CommitBench, adopting best practices for dataset creation. We sample commits from diverse projects with licenses that permit redistribution and apply our filtering and dataset enhancements to improve the quality of generated commit messages. We use CommitBench to compare existing models and show that other approaches are outperformed by a Transformer model pretrained on source code. Maximilian Schall, Tamara Czinczoll, Gerard de Melo |
SANER | 2 |