Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arthur Kosmala
dblp:334/3965
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 57% Trustworthy machine learning · 20% Generative modeling · 20% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Spatio-Spectral Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024 Ewald-based Long-Range Message Passing for Molecular Graphs · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Scalability of Certified Adversarial Robustness with Generated Data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
certified robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Scalability of Certified Adversarial Robustness with Generated Data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Scalability of Certified Adversarial Robustness with Generated Data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Spatio-Spectral Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
spectral graph neural network |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Spatio-Spectral Graph Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
synthetic training data |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | On the Scalability of Certified Adversarial Robustness with Generated Data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unified Mechanism-Specific Amplification by Subsampling and Group Privacy Amplification · NeurIPS 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy accounting |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unified Mechanism-Specific Amplification by Subsampling and Group Privacy Amplification · NeurIPS 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › privacy amplification
privacy amplification by subsampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unified Mechanism-Specific Amplification by Subsampling and Group Privacy Amplification · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
long-range interaction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Ewald-based Long-Range Message Passing for Molecular Graphs · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › molecular representation learning
molecular graph learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Ewald-based Long-Range Message Passing for Molecular Graphs · ICML 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | On the Scalability of Certified Adversarial Robustness with Generated Data · NeurIPS 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy analysis › privacy models
group privacy |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Unified Mechanism-Specific Amplification by Subsampling and Group Privacy Amplification · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spectral filtering · 0.8renyi differential privacy · 0.8positional encoding · 0.8dominating pairs · 0.8diffusion model · 0.8conditional optimal transport · 0.8adversarial training · 0.8fourier space message passing · 0.7ewald summation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | On the Scalability of Certified Adversarial Robustness with Generated DataabstractCertified defenses against adversarial attacks offer formal guarantees on the robustness of a model, making them more reliable than empirical methods such as adversarial training, whose effectiveness is often later reduced by unseen attacks. Still, the limited certified robustness that is currently achievable has been a bottleneck for their practical adoption. Gowal et al. and Wang et al. have shown that generating additional training data using state-of-the-art diffusion models can considerably improve the robustness of adversarial training. In this work, we demonstrate that a similar approach can substantially improve deterministic certified defenses but also reveal notable differences in the scaling behavior between certified and empirical methods. In addition, we provide a list of recommendations to scale the robustness of certified training approaches. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art deterministic robustness certificates on CIFAR-10 for the $\ell_2$ ($\epsilon = 36/255$) and $\ell_{\infty}$ ($\epsilon = 8/255$) threat models, outperforming the previous results by $+3.95$ and $+1.39$ percentage points, respectively. Furthermore, we report similar improvements for CIFAR-100. Thomas Altstidl, David Dobre, Arthur Kosmala, Björn M. Eskofier, Gauthier Gidel, Leo Schwinn |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | Spatio-Spectral Graph Neural NetworksabstractSpatial Message Passing Graph Neural Networks (MPGNNs) are widely used for learning on graph-structured data. However, key limitations of *ℓ*-step MPGNNs are that their "receptive field" is typically limited to the *ℓ*-hop neighborhood of a node and that information exchange between distant nodes is limited by over-squashing. Motivated by these limitations, we propose *Spatio-Spectral Graph Neural Networks (S²GNNs)* – a new modeling paradigm for Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) that synergistically combines spatially and spectrally parametrized graph filters. Parameterizing filters partially in the frequency domain enables global yet efficient information propagation. We show that S²GNNs vanquish over-squashing and yield strictly tighter approximation-theoretic error bounds than MPGNNs. Further, rethinking graph convolutions at a fundamental level unlocks new design spaces. For example, S²GNNs allow for free positional encodings that make them strictly more expressive than the 1-Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) test. Moreover, to obtain general-purpose S²GNNs, we propose spectrally parametrized filters for directed graphs. S²GNNs outperform spatial MPGNNs, graph transformers, and graph rewirings, e.g., on the peptide long-range benchmark tasks, and are competitive with state-of-the-art sequence modeling. On a 40 GB GPU, S²GNNs scale to millions of nodes. Simon Geisler, Arthur Kosmala, Daniel Herbst, Stephan Günnemann |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Unified Mechanism-Specific Amplification by Subsampling and Group Privacy AmplificationabstractAmplification by subsampling is one of the main primitives in machine learning with differential privacy (DP): Training a model on random batches instead of complete datasets results in stronger privacy. This is traditionally formalized via mechanism-agnostic subsampling guarantees that express the privacy parameters of a subsampled mechanism as a function of the original mechanism's privacy parameters. We propose the first general framework for deriving mechanism-specific guarantees, which leverage additional information beyond these parameters to more tightly characterize the subsampled mechanism's privacy. Such guarantees are of particular importance for privacy accounting, i.e., tracking privacy over multiple iterations. Overall, our framework based on conditional optimal transport lets us derive existing and novel guarantees for approximate DP, accounting with Renyi DP, and accounting with dominating pairs in a unified, principled manner. As an application, we analyze how subsampling affects the privacy of groups of multiple users. Our tight mechanism-specific bounds outperform tight mechanism-agnostic bounds and classic group privacy results. Jan Schuchardt, Mihail Stoian, Arthur Kosmala, Stephan Günnemann |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Ewald-based Long-Range Message Passing for Molecular GraphsabstractNeural architectures that learn potential energy surfaces from molecular data have undergone fast improvement in recent years. A key driver of this success is the Message Passing Neural Network (MPNN) paradigm. Its favorable scaling with system size partly relies upon a spatial distance limit on messages. While this focus on locality is a useful inductive bias, it also impedes the learning of long-range interactions such as electrostatics and van der Waals forces. To address this drawback, we propose Ewald message passing: a nonlocal Fourier space scheme which limits interactions via a cutoff on frequency instead of distance, and is theoretically well-founded in the Ewald summation method. It can serve as an augmentation on top of existing MPNN architectures as it is computationally inexpensive and agnostic to architectural details. We test the approach with four baseline models and two datasets containing diverse periodic (OC20) and aperiodic structures (OE62). Across all models and datasets, we observe robust improvements in energy mean absolute errors, averaging 10% on OC20 and 16% on OE62. Our analysis shows an outsize impact of these improvements on structures with high long-range contributions to the ground-truth energy. Arthur Kosmala, Johannes Gasteiger, Nicholas Gao, Stephan Günnemann |
ICML | 1 |