As interest grows in generating long, detailed image captions, standard evaluation metrics become increasingly unreliable.N-gram-based metrics though efficient, fail to capture semantic correctness.Representational Similarity (RS) metrics, designed to address this, initially saw limited use due to high computational costs, while today, despite advances in hardware, they remain unpopular due to low correlation to human judgments.Meanwhile, metrics based on large language models (LLMs) show strong correlation with human judgments, but remain too expensive for iterative use during model development.We introduce SPECS (Specificity-Enhanced CLIP-Score), a reference-free RS metric tailored to long image captioning.SPECS modifies CLIP with a new objective that emphasizes specificity: rewarding correct details and penalizing incorrect ones.We show that SPECS matches the performance of open-source LLMbased metrics in correlation to human judgments, while being far more efficient.This makes it a practical alternative for iterative checkpoint evaluation during image captioning model development.