Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Achyuta Rajaram
dblp:334/7772
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature interpretation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agent · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agent · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agent · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision-language model · 0.8tool use · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | A Multimodal Automated Interpretability AgentabstractThis paper describes MAIA, a Multimodal Automated Interpretability Agent. MAIA is a system that uses neural models to automate neural model understanding tasks like feature interpretation and failure mode discovery. It equips a pre-trained vision-language model with a set of tools that support iterative experimentation on subcomponents of other models to explain their behavior. These include tools commonly used by human interpretability researchers: for synthesizing and editing inputs, computing maximally activating exemplars from real-world datasets, and summarizing and describing experimental results. Interpretability experiments proposed by MAIA compose these tools to describe and explain system behavior. We evaluate applications of MAIA to computer vision models. We first characterize MAIA’s ability to describe (neuron-level) features in learned representations of images. Across several trained models and a novel dataset of synthetic vision neurons with paired ground-truth descriptions, MAIA produces descriptions comparable to those generated by expert human experimenters. We then show that MAIA can aid in two additional interpretability tasks: reducing sensitivity to spurious features, and automatically identifying inputs likely to be mis-classified. Tamar Rott Shaham, Sarah Schwettmann, Franklin Wang, Achyuta Rajaram, Evan Hernandez, Jacob Andreas, Antonio Torralba 0001 |
ICML | 4 |