Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zachary Ankner
dblp:334/7825
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8307-3456ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 55% Generative modeling · 19% Deep learning architectures and training · 13% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
data pruning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Models · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Keep a Promise: Scaling Language Model Decoding Parallelism with Learned Asynchronous Decoding · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference acceleration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Keep a Promise: Scaling Language Model Decoding Parallelism with Learned Asynchronous Decoding · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization
post-training quantization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scaling Laws for Precision · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scaling Laws for Precision · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scaling Laws for Precision · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
3d-aware image synthesis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | 3D Neural Field Generation Using Triplane Diffusion · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | 3D Neural Field Generation Using Triplane Diffusion · CVPR 2023 |
Geometric modeling and processing
implicit neural representation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | 3D Neural Field Generation Using Triplane Diffusion · CVPR 2023 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape representation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | 3D Neural Field Generation Using Triplane Diffusion · CVPR 2023 |
Geometric modeling and processing › implicit neural representation
triplane representation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | 3D Neural Field Generation Using Triplane Diffusion · CVPR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data-efficient learning
data-efficient pretraining |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference Models · ICLR 2025 |
Programming languages and type systems › specification language
annotation language |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Keep a Promise: Scaling Language Model Decoding Parallelism with Learned Asynchronous Decoding · ICML 2025 |
Programming languages and type systems
domain-specific languages |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Learning to Keep a Promise: Scaling Language Model Decoding Parallelism with Learned Asynchronous Decoding · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interpreter · 1.7instruction fine-tuning · 1.7triplane factorization · 1.3diffusion model · 1.3small reference models · 0.9scaling laws · 0.9perplexity-based pruning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Perplexed by Perplexity: Perplexity-Based Data Pruning With Small Reference ModelsabstractIn this work, we investigate whether small language models can determine high-quality subsets of large-scale text datasets that improve the performance of larger language models. While existing work has shown that pruning based on the perplexity of a larger model can yield high-quality data, we investigate whether smaller models can be used for perplexity-based pruning and how pruning is affected by the domain composition of the data being pruned. We demonstrate that for multiple dataset compositions, perplexity-based pruning of pretraining data can significantly improve downstream task performance: pruning based on perplexities computed with a 125 million parameter model improves the average performance on downstream tasks of a 3 billion parameter model by up to 2.04 and achieves up to a 1.45× reduction in pretraining steps to reach commensurate baseline performance. Furthermore, we demonstrate that such perplexity-based data pruning also yields downstream performance gains in the over-trained and data-constrained regimes. Zachary Ankner, Cody Blakeney, Kartik Sreenivasan, Max Marion, Matthew L. Leavitt, Mansheej Paul |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | Scaling Laws for PrecisionabstractLow precision training and inference affect both the quality and cost of language models, but current scaling laws do not account for this. In this work, we devise "precision-aware" scaling laws for both training and inference. We propose that training in lower precision reduces the model's "effective parameter count," allowing us to predict the additional loss incurred from training in low precision and post-train quantization. For inference, we find that the degradation introduced by post-training quantization increases as models are trained on more data, eventually making additional pretraining data actively harmful. For training, our scaling laws allow us to predict the loss of a model with different parts in different precisions, and suggest that training larger models in lower precision can be compute optimal. We unify the scaling laws for post and pretraining quantization to arrive at a single functional form that predicts degradation from training and inference in varied precisions. We fit on over 465 pretraining runs and validate our predictions on model sizes up to 1.7B parameters trained on up to 26B tokens. Tanishq Kumar, Zachary Ankner, Benjamin Spector, Blake Bordelon, Niklas Muennighoff, Mansheej Paul, Cengiz Pehlevan, Christopher Ré, Aditi Raghunathan |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Learning to Keep a Promise: Scaling Language Model Decoding Parallelism with Learned Asynchronous DecodingabstractDecoding with autoregressive language models traditionally occurs sequentially, generating one token after another. Recent attempts to introduce parallelism require a pre-determined structure in the generated content to implement parallel generation, such as by pattern-matching on bullet points. In this work, we present a new technique to automate parallel generation by dynamically exploiting the semantic independence of generation outputs to implement asynchronous decoding. We introduce an annotation language Pasta-Lang for language models to initiate asynchronous decoding at inference time. We also develop an accompanying Pasta-Lang interpreter that performs on-the-fly asynchronous decoding, effectively implementing parallel generation and speeding up inference. We present an instruction-finetuning dataset with Pasta-Lang-annotated responses for teaching LLMs to annotate semantic independence with Pasta-Lang as well as the methodology for creating the dataset. Our evaluation shows using the interpreter with a Pasta-Lang-equipped model achieves significant speedup while maintaining the same generation quality. Ellie Y. Cheng, Zachary Ankner, Nikunj Saunshi, Blake M. Elias, Amir Yazdanbakhsh, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley, Suvinay Subramanian, Michael Carbin |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | 3D Neural Field Generation Using Triplane DiffusionabstractDiffusion models have emerged as the state-of-the-art for image generation, among other tasks. Here, we present an efficient diffusion-based model for 3D-aware generation of neural fields. Our approach pre-processes training data, such as ShapeNet meshes, by converting them to continuous occupancy fields and factoring them into a set of axis-aligned triplane feature representations. Thus, our 3D training scenes are all represented by 2D feature planes, and we can directly train existing 2D diffusion models on these representations to generate 3D neural fields with high quality and diversity, outperforming alternative approaches to 3D-aware generation. Our approach requires essential modifications to existing triplane factorization pipelines to make the resulting features easy to learn for the diffusion model. We demonstrate state-of-the-art results on 3D generation on several object classes from ShapeNet. J. Ryan Shue, Eric R. Chan, Ryan Po, Zachary Ankner, Jiajun Wu 0001, Gordon Wetzstein |
CVPR | 4 |
| 2022 | EntailSum: An Entailment-Based Approach to Aspect-Based Text Summarization with Automated Aspect AdaptationabstractAspect-based summarization differs from generic text-summarization in which the generated summary must be conditioned on a given topic. A fundamental challenge to the aspect-based summarization approach is the lack of labeled data for training models, which limits the usage of supervised methods. One approach to address this issue is to introduce human intervention to generate unique datasets per aspect. However, there is a large number of possible aspects to summarize which makes this option impossible to scale. This limits the use of typical modeling techniques, and requires methods which excel in few-shot, or ideally zero-shot regimes. Hence, in this research, we propose a modular, two-step approach that does not need any aspect-based supervision. This research combines recent advances in zero-shot text classification and generic summarization in a novel way. The backbone of the proposed approach is a transformer network trained for the task of textual entailment, which is used to reduce a document to the set of on topic sentences. In the experiments, our model achieves a new state of the art compared to other unsupervised models on the MA-News dataset (ROUGE-1 35.70 and ROUGE-2 15.52), and even outperforms fine-tuned models without any supervision of its own. Zachary Ankner, Purvaja Balaji, Chun Keat Hiew, Amar Gupta |
Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell. | 1 |