Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tom Verbin

dblp:334/7853 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 70% Autonomous driving · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
expressive power
0.712023
On the Ability of Graph Neural Networks to Model Interactions Between Vertices · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.712023
On the Ability of Graph Neural Networks to Model Interactions Between Vertices · NeurIPS 2023
Robotics › Autonomous driving
interaction modeling
0.712023
On the Ability of Graph Neural Networks to Model Interactions Between Vertices · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph structure learning
edge sparsification
0.212023
On the Ability of Graph Neural Networks to Model Interactions Between Vertices · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

walk index analysis · 0.7separation rank · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 On the Ability of Graph Neural Networks to Model Interactions Between Vertices
abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are widely used for modeling complex interactions between entities represented as vertices of a graph. Despite recent efforts to theoretically analyze the expressive power of GNNs, a formal characterization of their ability to model interactions is lacking. The current paper aims to address this gap. Formalizing strength of interactions through an established measure known as separation rank, we quantify the ability of certain GNNs to model interaction between a given subset of vertices and its complement, i.e. between the sides of a given partition of input vertices. Our results reveal that the ability to model interaction is primarily determined by the partition's walk index --- a graph-theoretical characteristic defined by the number of walks originating from the boundary of the partition. Experiments with common GNN architectures corroborate this finding. As a practical application of our theory, we design an edge sparsification algorithm named Walk Index Sparsification (WIS), which preserves the ability of a GNN to model interactions when input edges are removed. WIS is simple, computationally efficient, and in our experiments has markedly outperformed alternative methods in terms of induced prediction accuracy. More broadly, it showcases the potential of improving GNNs by theoretically analyzing the interactions they can model.
Noam Razin, Tom Verbin, Nadav Cohen 0001
NeurIPS2