Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mahmoud Hegazy
dblp:335/5388
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Valid Selection among Conformal Sets · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › conformal prediction
online conformal prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Valid Selection among Conformal Sets · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Valid Selection among Conformal Sets · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stability-based selection · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Valid Selection among Conformal SetsabstractConformal prediction offers a distribution-free framework for constructing prediction sets with coverage guarantees. In practice, multiple valid conformal prediction sets may be available, arising from different models or methodologies. However, selecting the most desirable set, such as the smallest, can invalidate the coverage guarantees. To address this challenge, we propose a stability-based approach that ensures coverage for the selected prediction set. We extend our results to the online conformal setting, propose several refinements in settings where additional structure is available, and demonstrate its effectiveness through experiments. Mahmoud Hegazy, Liviu Aolaritei, Michael I. Jordan, Aymeric Dieuleveut |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Compression with Exact Error Distribution for Federated LearningabstractCompression schemes have been extensively used in Federated Learning (FL) to reduce the communication cost of distributed learning. While most approaches rely on a bounded variance assumption of the noise produced by the compressor, this paper investigates the use of compression and aggregation schemes that produce a specific error distribution, e.g., Gaussian or Laplace, on the aggregated data. We present and analyze different aggregation schemes based on layered quantizers achieving exact error distribution. We provide different methods to leverage the proposed compression schemes to obtain compression-for-free in differential privacy applications. Our general compression methods can recover and improve standard FL schemes with Gaussian perturbations such as Langevin dynamics and randomized smoothing. Mahmoud Hegazy, Rémi Leluc, Cheuk Ting Li, Aymeric Dieuleveut |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2022 | Randomized Quantization with Exact Error DistributionabstractWe design a randomized scalar quantization scheme, where the quantization error is independent of the source and follows any given unimodal distribution (e.g. Gaussian distribution) exactly. We characterize the optimal encoding length of the quantization, and show that our scheme is optimal. This can also be regarded as a one-shot channel simulation setting, where the channel to be simulated is an additive noise channel. Potential applications include neural compression and coupling from the past. Mahmoud Hegazy, Cheuk Ting Li |
ITW | 1 |