EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhuoyu Xie
dblp:335/7100
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0002-0624-843XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 67% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 33% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 62% Hardware security and side channels · 38% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ML-Cube: Accelerating Module-Lattice-Based Cryptography using Machine Learning Accelerators with a Memory-Less Design · CCS 2025 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU computing
cryptographic acceleration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ML-Cube: Accelerating Module-Lattice-Based Cryptography using Machine Learning Accelerators with a Memory-Less Design · CCS 2025 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ML-Cube: Accelerating Module-Lattice-Based Cryptography using Machine Learning Accelerators with a Memory-Less Design · CCS 2025 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU computing
tensor cores |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | ML-Cube: Accelerating Module-Lattice-Based Cryptography using Machine Learning Accelerators with a Memory-Less Design · CCS 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel countermeasures
cache side-channel defense |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ML-Cube: Accelerating Module-Lattice-Based Cryptography using Machine Learning Accelerators with a Memory-Less Design · CCS 2025 |
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel countermeasures |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | ML-Cube: Accelerating Module-Lattice-Based Cryptography using Machine Learning Accelerators with a Memory-Less Design · CCS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polynomial multiplication · 1.7SIMT parallelism · 1.7number-theoretic transform · 0.9number theoretic transform · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ML-Cube: Accelerating Module-Lattice-Based Cryptography using Machine Learning Accelerators with a Memory-Less DesignabstractThe rapid advancement of AI technologies has led to a dramatic surge in computational demands, driving significant breakthroughs in ML accelerators. The powerful performance of these accelerators has attracted the attention of cryptography researchers, and recent studies have begun to explore their use in accelerating cryptographic operations. However, treating these accelerators as black boxes leads to high latency, and strict concurrency requirements, which hinder their practical deployment. In this paper, we go beyond the black-box treatment of ML accelerators and introduce ML-Cube (ML3), a novel memory-less framework that leverages ML accelerators to implement module-lattice-based PQC, FIPS 203 ML-KEM, and FIPS 204 ML-DSA. The performance benefits of ML-Cube arise from our thorough analysis of ML accelerator internals. Rather than treating the accelerators as black boxes, we dissect their operating mechanisms and design tailored mathematical transformations for cryptographic acceleration. This enables memory-less (I)NTT and polynomial multiplication that minimizes external memory dependencies and reduces latency. We further address the high latency and excessive parallelism demands of traditional SIMT-based implementations by fully parallelizing both ML-KEM and ML-DSA schemes. Our experiments show that our Tensor Core-based (I)NTT achieves a 2.03x--3.56x speedup over a highly-optimized CUDA-core implementation. Moreover, our memory-less polynomial multiplication attains a 10x speedup, and the full ML-KEM reaches up to a 3.58x speedup with only less than one-tenth of the latency compared with SOTA approach (CHES '24). Additionally, our enhanced ML-DSA implementation offers a 30% to 55% throughput improvement over the previous SOTA methods (TDSC '24) under the server-oriented model. Importantly, by confining core computations within registers, our approach inherently mitigates memory disclosure and cache-based side-channel attacks, thereby enhancing overall security. Fangyu Zheng, Zhuoyu Xie, Wenxu Tang, Guang Fan 0001, Yijing Ning, Yi Bian 0001, Jingqiang Lin 0001, Jiwu Jing |
CCS | 3 |
| 2024 | MVTr: multi-feature voxel transformer for 3D object detection
Lingmei Ai, Zhuoyu Xie, Ruoxia Yao, Mengyao Yang |
Vis. Comput. | 2 |