Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Skander Moalla
dblp:336/2569
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 53% Language models and text generation · 21% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Quantile Reward Policy Optimization: Alignment with Pointwise Regression and Exact Partition Functions · NeurIPS 2025 No Representation, No Trust: Connecting Representation, Collapse, and Trust Issues in PPO · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Apertus: Democratizing Open and Compliant LLMs for Global Language Environments · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Quantile Reward Policy Optimization: Alignment with Pointwise Regression and Exact Partition Functions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
KL-regularized RL |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Quantile Reward Policy Optimization: Alignment with Pointwise Regression and Exact Partition Functions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback › learning from human feedback
RLHF |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Quantile Reward Policy Optimization: Alignment with Pointwise Regression and Exact Partition Functions · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
efficient training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Building on Efficient Foundations: Effective Training of LLMs with Structured Feedforward Layers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Building on Efficient Foundations: Effective Training of LLMs with Structured Feedforward Layers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Building on Efficient Foundations: Effective Training of LLMs with Structured Feedforward Layers · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
plasticity loss |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | No Representation, No Trust: Connecting Representation, Collapse, and Trust Issues in PPO · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
proximal policy optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | No Representation, No Trust: Connecting Representation, Collapse, and Trust Issues in PPO · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representation collapse |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | No Representation, No Trust: Connecting Representation, Collapse, and Trust Issues in PPO · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SMACv2: An Improved Benchmark for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SMACv2: An Improved Benchmark for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
partial observability |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SMACv2: An Improved Benchmark for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Apertus: Democratizing Open and Compliant LLMs for Global Language Environments · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantile regression · 0.9pointwise reward · 0.9offline RL · 0.9trust region regularization · 0.8self-guided training · 0.8low-rank approximation · 0.8block-diagonal matrix · 0.8auxiliary loss · 0.8centralised training with decentralised execution · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Apertus: Democratizing Open and Compliant LLMs for Global Language EnvironmentsabstractAlejandro Hernández-Cano, Alexander Hägele, Allen Hao Huang, Angelika Romanou, Antoni-Joan Solergibert, Barna Pásztor, Bettina Messmer, Dhia Garbaya, Eduard Frank Ďurech, Ido Hakimi, Juan Garcia Giraldo, Mete Ismayilzada, Negar Foroutan, Skander Moalla, Tiancheng Chen, Vinko Sabolčec, Yixuan Xu, Michael Aerni, Badr AlKhamissi, Inés Altemir Marinas, Mohammad Hossein Amani, Matin Ansaripour, Ilia Badanin, Harold Benoit, Emanuela Boros, Nicholas John Browning, Fabian Bösch, Maximilian Böther, Niklas Canova, Camille Challier, Clément Charmillot, Jonathan Coles, Jan Milan Deriu, Arnout Devos, Lukas Drescher, Daniil Dzenhaliou, Maud Ehrmann, Dongyang Fan, Simin Fan, Silin Gao, Miguel Gila, María Grandury, Diba Hashemi, Alexander Miserlis Hoyle, Jiaming Jiang, Mark Klein, Andrei Kucharavy, Anastasiia Kucherenko, Frederike Lübeck, Roman Machacek, Theofilos Ioannis Manitaras, Andreas Marfurt, Kyle Matoba, Simon Matrenok, Henrique Mendonça, Fawzi Roberto Mohamed, Syrielle Montariol, Luca Mouchel, Sven Najem-Meyer, Jingwei Ni, Gennaro Oliva, Matteo Pagliardini, Elia Palme, Andrei Panferov, Léo Paoletti, Marco Passerini, Ivan Pavlov, Auguste Poiroux, Kaustubh Ponkshe, Nathan Ranchin, Javier Rando, Mathieu Sauser, Jakhongir Saydaliev, Mukhammadali Sayfiddinov, Marian Schneider, Stefano Schuppli, Marco Scialanga, Andrei Semenov, Kumar Shridhar, Raghav Singhal, Anna Sotnikova, Alexander Sternfeld, Ayush Kumar Tarun, Paul Teiletche, Jannis Vamvas, Xiaozhe Yao, Hao Zhao, Alexander Ilic, Ana Klimovic, Andreas Krause, Caglar Gulcehre, David Rosenthal, Elliott Ash, Florian Tramèr, Joost VandeVondele, Livio Veraldi, Martin Rajman, Thomas C. Schulthess, Torsten Hoefler, Antoine Bosselut, Martin Jaggi, Imanol Schlag. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Alejandro Hernández-Cano, Alexander Hägele, Allen Hao Huang, Angelika Romanou, Antoni-Joan Solergibert i Llaquet, Barna Pásztor, Bettina Messmer, Dhia Garbaya, Eduard Durech, Ido Hakimi, Juan Garcia Giraldo, Mete Ismayilzada, Negar Foroutan Eghlidi, Skander Moalla, Tiancheng Chen, Vinko Sabolcec, Yixuan Even Xu, Michael Aerni, Badr AlKhamissi, Ines Altemir Marinas, Mohammad Hossein Amani, Matin Ansaripour, Ilia Badanin, Harold Benoit, Emanuela Boros, Nicholas John Browning, Fabian Bösch, Maximilian Böther, Niklas Canova, Camille Challier, Clément Charmillot, Jonathan Coles, Jan Deriu, Arnout Devos, Lukas Drescher, Daniil Dzenhaliou, Maud Ehrmann, Dongyang Fan, Simin Fan, Silin Gao, Miguel Gila, María Grandury, Diba Hashemi, Alexander Miserlis Hoyle, Jiaming Jiang, Mark Klein 0002, Andrei Kucharavy, Anastasiia Kucherenko, Frederike Lübeck, Roman Machacek, Theofilos Ioannis Manitaras, Andreas Marfurt, Kyle Matoba, Simon Matrenok, Henrique Mendonça, Fawzi Roberto Mohamed, Syrielle Montariol, Luca Mouchel, Sven Najem-Meyer, Jingwei Ni, Gennaro Oliva, Matteo Pagliardini, Elia Palme, Andrei Panferov, Léo Paoletti, Marco Passerini, Ivan Pavlov, Auguste Poiroux, Kaustubh Ponkshe, Nathan Ranchin, Javier Rando, Mathieu Sauser, Jakhongir Saydaliev, Mukhammadali Sayfiddinov, Marian Schneider, Stefano Schuppli, Marco Scialanga, Andrei Semenov, Kumar Shridhar, Raghav Singhal, Anna Sotnikova, Alexander Sternfeld, Ayush K. Tarun, Paul Teiletche, Jannis Vamvas, Xiaozhe Yao, Alexander Ilic, Ana Klimovic, Andreas Krause 0001, Caglar Gulcehre, David Rosenthal, Elliott Ash, Florian Tramèr, Joost VandeVondele, Livio Veraldi, Martin Rajman, Thomas C. Schulthess, Torsten Hoefler, Antoine Bosselut, Martin Jaggi, Imanol Schlag |
ACL (1) | 14 |
| 2025 | Quantile Reward Policy Optimization: Alignment with Pointwise Regression and Exact Partition FunctionsabstractAligning large language models with pointwise absolute rewards has so far required online, on-policy algorithms such as PPO and GRPO.
In contrast, simpler methods that can leverage offline or off-policy data, such as DPO and REBEL, are limited to learning from preference pairs or relative signals.
To bridge this gap, we introduce Quantile Reward Policy Optimization (QRPO), which learns from pointwise absolute rewards while preserving the simplicity and offline applicability of DPO-like methods.
QRPO uses quantile rewards to enable regression to the closed-form solution of the KL-regularized RL objective.
This reward yields an analytically tractable partition function, removing the need for relative signals to cancel this term.
Moreover, QRPO scales with increased compute to estimate quantile rewards, opening a new dimension for pre-computation scaling.
Empirically, QRPO consistently achieves top performance on chat and coding evaluations—reward model scores, AlpacaEval 2, and LeetCode—compared to DPO, REBEL, and SimPO across diverse datasets and 8B-scale models.
Finally, we find that training with robust rewards instead of converting them to preferences induces less length bias. Simon Matrenok, Skander Moalla, Caglar Gulcehre |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | No Representation, No Trust: Connecting Representation, Collapse, and Trust Issues in PPOabstractReinforcement learning (RL) is inherently rife with non-stationarity since the states and rewards the agent observes during training depend on its changing policy.
Therefore, networks in deep RL must be capable of adapting to new observations and fitting new targets.
However, previous works have observed that networks trained under non-stationarity exhibit an inability to continue learning, termed loss of plasticity, and eventually a collapse in performance.
For off-policy deep value-based RL methods, this phenomenon has been correlated with a decrease in representation rank and the ability to fit random targets, termed capacity loss.
Although this correlation has generally been attributed to neural network learning under non-stationarity, the connection to representation dynamics has not been carefully studied in on-policy policy optimization methods.
In this work, we empirically study representation dynamics in Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) on the Atari and MuJoCo environments, revealing that PPO agents are also affected by feature rank deterioration and capacity loss.
We show that this is aggravated by stronger non-stationarity, ultimately driving the actor's performance to collapse, regardless of the performance of the critic.
We ask why the trust region, specific to methods like PPO, cannot alleviate or prevent the collapse and find a connection between representation collapse and the degradation of the trust region, one exacerbating the other.
Finally, we present Proximal Feature Optimization (PFO), a novel auxiliary loss that, along with other interventions, shows that regularizing the representation dynamics mitigates the performance collapse of PPO agents.
Code and run histories are available at https://github.com/CLAIRE-Labo/no-representation-no-trust. Skander Moalla, Andrea Miele, Daniil Pyatko, Razvan Pascanu, Caglar Gulcehre |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Building on Efficient Foundations: Effective Training of LLMs with Structured Feedforward LayersabstractState-of-the-art results in large language models (LLMs) often rely on scale, which
becomes computationally expensive. This has sparked a research agenda to reduce
these models’ parameter counts and computational costs without significantly
impacting their performance. Our study focuses on transformer-based LLMs,
specifically targeting the computationally intensive feedforward networks (FFNs),
which are less studied than attention blocks. We consider three structured linear
parameterizations of the FFN using efficient low-rank and block-diagonal matrices.
In contrast to many previous works that examined these approximations, our study
i) explores these structures from a training-from-scratch perspective, ii) scales up
to 1.3B parameters, and iii) is conducted within recent Transformer-based LLMs
rather than convolutional architectures. We demonstrate that these structures can
lead to actual computational gains in various scenarios, including online decoding
when using a pre-merge technique. Additionally, we propose a novel training
regime, called self-guided training, aimed at improving the poor training dynamics
that these approximations exhibit when used from initialization. Interestingly,
the scaling performance of structured matrices is explored, revealing steeper
curves in scaling training FLOPs, along with a favorable scaling trend in the
overtraining regime. Specifically, we show that wide and structured networks
can utilize training FLOPs more efficiently, with fewer parameters and lower
loss than dense models at their optimal trade-off. Our code is available at
https://github.com/CLAIRE-Labo/StructuredFFN/tree/main. Xiuying Wei, Skander Moalla, Razvan Pascanu, Caglar Gulcehre |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | SMACv2: An Improved Benchmark for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement LearningabstractThe availability of challenging benchmarks has played a key role in the recent progress of machine learning. In cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning, the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge (SMAC) has become a popular testbed for centralised training with decentralised execution. However, after years of sustained improvement on SMAC, algorithms now achieve near-perfect performance. In this work, we conduct new analysis demonstrating that SMAC lacks the stochasticity and partial observability to require complex closed-loop policies. In particular, we show that an open-loop policy conditioned only on the timestep can achieve non-trivial win rates for many SMAC scenarios. To address this limitation, we introduce SMACv2, a new version of the benchmark where scenarios are procedurally generated and require agents to generalise to previously unseen settings (from the same distribution) during evaluation. We also introduce the extended partial observability challenge (EPO), which augments SMACv2 to ensure meaningful partial observability. We show that these changes ensure the benchmarkrequires the use of closed-loop policies. We evaluate state-of-the-art algorithms on SMACv2 and show that it presents significant challenges not present in the original benchmark. Our analysis illustrates that SMACv2 addresses the discovered deficiencies of SMAC and can help benchmark the next generation of MARL methods. Videos of training are available on our website. Benjamin Ellis, Jonathan Cook 0004, Skander Moalla, Mikayel Samvelyan, Mingfei Sun 0001, Anuj Mahajan, Jakob N. Foerster, Shimon Whiteson |
NeurIPS | 3 |