Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brydon Eastman
dblp:336/3485
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning
physics-informed neural networks |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Symbolic Differential Operator Discovery with Sparse Data · ICML 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge discovery
equation discovery |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Symbolic Differential Operator Discovery with Sparse Data · ICML 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
symbolic regression |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Symbolic Differential Operator Discovery with Sparse Data · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic regression · 1.3physics-informed neural networks · 1.3AI Feynman · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Universal Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Symbolic Differential Operator Discovery with Sparse DataabstractIn this work we perform symbolic discovery of differential operators in a situation where there is sparse experimental data. This small data regime in machine learning can be made tractable by providing our algorithms with prior information about the underlying dynamics. Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have been very successful in this regime (reconstructing entire ODE solutions using only a single point or entire PDE solutions with very few measurements of the initial condition). The Universal PINN approach (UPINN) adds a neural network that learns a representation of unknown hidden terms in the differential equation. The algorithm yields both a surrogate solution to the differential equation and a black-box representation of the hidden terms. These hidden term neural networks can then be converted into symbolic equations using symbolic regression techniques like AI Feynman. In order to achieve convergence of the neural networks, we provide our algorithms with (noisy) measurements of both the initial condition as well as (synthetic) experimental data obtained at later times. We demonstrate strong performance of UPINNs even when provided with very few measurements of noisy data in both the ODE and PDE regime. Lena Podina, Brydon Eastman, Mohammad Kohandel |
ICML | 2 |