EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dekel Galor
dblp:336/4228
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 40% Generative modeling · 35% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 19% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Brain-like Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2025 Poisson Variational Autoencoder · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › computational neuroscience › neural coding
predictive coding |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | Brain-like Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2025 Poisson Variational Autoencoder · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
iterative inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Brain-like Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
sparse coding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Poisson Variational Autoencoder · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
spiking neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Brain-like Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational free energy · 0.9particle gibbs · 0.9natural gradient · 0.9variational inference · 0.8predictive coding · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Event2Audio: Event-Based Optical Vibration SensingabstractSmall vibrations observed in video can unveil information beyond what is visual, such as sound and material properties. It is possible to passively record these vibrations when they are visually perceptible, or actively amplify their visual contribution with a laser beam when they are not perceptible. In this paper, we improve upon the active sensing approach by leveraging event-based cameras, which are designed to efficiently capture fast motion. We demonstrate our method experimentally by recovering audio from vibrations, even for multiple simultaneous sources, and in the presence of environmental distortions. Our approach matches the state-of-the-art reconstruction quality at much faster speeds, approaching real-time processing. Mingxuan Cai, Dekel Galor, Amit P. S. Kohli, Jacob L. Yates, Laura Waller |
ICCP | 2 |
| 2025 | Brain-like Variational InferenceabstractInference in both brains and machines can be formalized by optimizing a shared objective: maximizing the evidence lower bound (ELBO) in machine learning, or minimizing variational free energy ($\mathcal{F}$) in neuroscience (ELBO = $-\mathcal{F}$). While this equivalence suggests a unifying framework, it leaves open how inference is implemented in neural systems. Here, we introduce FOND (*Free energy Online Natural-gradient Dynamics*), a framework that derives neural inference dynamics from three principles: (1) natural gradients on $\mathcal{F}$, (2) online belief updating, and (3) iterative refinement. We apply FOND to derive iP-VAE (*iterative Poisson variational autoencoder*), a recurrent spiking neural network that performs variational inference through membrane potential dynamics, replacing amortized encoders with iterative inference updates. Theoretically, iP-VAE yields several desirable features such as emergent normalization via lateral competition, and hardware-efficient integer spike count representations. Empirically, iP-VAE outperforms both standard VAEs and Gaussian-based predictive coding models in sparsity, reconstruction, and biological plausibility, and scales to complex color image datasets such as CelebA. iP-VAE also exhibits strong generalization to out-of-distribution inputs, exceeding hybrid iterative-amortized VAEs. These results demonstrate how deriving inference algorithms from first principles can yield concrete architectures that are simultaneously biologically plausible and empirically effective. Hadi Vafaii, Dekel Galor, Jacob L. Yates |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | Poisson Variational AutoencoderabstractVariational autoencoders (VAE) employ Bayesian inference to interpret sensory inputs, mirroring processes that occur in primate vision across both ventral (Higgins et al., 2021) and dorsal (Vafaii et al., 2023) pathways. Despite their success, traditional VAEs rely on continuous latent variables, which significantly deviates from the discrete nature of biological neurons. Here, we developed the Poisson VAE (P-VAE), a novel architecture that combines principles of predictive coding with a VAE that encodes inputs into discrete spike counts. Combining Poisson-distributed latent variables with predictive coding introduces a metabolic cost term in the model loss function, suggesting a relationship with sparse coding which we verify empirically. Additionally, we analyze the geometry of learned representations, contrasting the P-VAE to alternative VAE models. We find that the P-VAE encodes its inputs in relatively higher dimensions, facilitating linear separability of categories in a downstream classification task with a much better (5x) sample efficiency. Our work provides an interpretable computational framework to study brain-like sensory processing and paves the way for a deeper understanding of perception as an inferential process. Hadi Vafaii, Dekel Galor, Jacob L. Yates |
NeurIPS | 2 |