Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle when prompted to generate content under specific constraints. However, in such cases it is often easy to check whether these constraints are satisfied or violated. Recent works have shown that LLMs can benefit from such ``corrective feedback''. Here we claim that this skill of LLMs can be significantly enhanced via training. We introduce an RL framework for teaching models to use such rewards, by simulating interaction sessions, and rewarding the model according to its ability to satisfy the constraints. We refer to our method as CORGI (Controlled Generation with RL for Guided Interaction), and evaluate it on a variety of controlled generation tasks. We find that CORGI consistently outperforms the baseline reinforcement learning method that does not incorporate conversational feedback. Furthermore, CORGI's interactive framework enables meta-learning, allowing the LLM to better generalize to guided interaction in new tasks. Our results clearly show that conversational optimization, when combined with reinforcement learning, significantly improves the effectiveness of LLMs in controlled generation contexts.

Large Language Models (LLM) technology is rapidly advancing towards human- like dialogue. Values are fundamental drivers of human behavior, yet research on the values expressed in LLM-generated text remains limited. While prior work has begun to explore value ranking in LLMs, the crucial aspect of value correlation – the interrelationship and consistency between different values – has been largely un-examined. Drawing on established psychological theories of human value structure, this paper investigates whether LLMs exhibit human-like value correlations within a single session, reflecting a coherent “persona”. Our findings reveal that standard prompting methods fail to produce human-consistent value correlations. However, we demonstrate that a novel prompting strategy (referred to as "Value Anchoring"), significantly improves the alignment of LLM value correlations with human data. Furthermore, we analyze the mechanism by which Value Anchoring achieves this effect. These results not only deepen our understanding of value representation in LLMs but also introduce new methodologies for evaluating consistency and human-likeness in LLM responses, highlighting the importance of explicit value prompting for generating human-aligned outputs.

Ori Ram, Liat Bezalel, Adi Zicher, Yonatan Belinkov, Jonathan Berant, Amir Globerson. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023.