In Telephone Broadcasting, the goal is to disseminate a message from a given source vertex of an input graph to all other vertices in the minimum number of rounds, where at each round, an informed vertex can send the message to at most one of its uninformed neighbors. For general graphs of n vertices, the problem is NP-complete, and the best existing algorithm has an approximation factor of 𝒪(log n/ log log n). The existence of a constant factor approximation for the general graphs is still unknown. In this paper, we study the problem in two simple families of sparse graphs, namely, cacti and graphs of bounded pathwidth. There have been several efforts to understand the complexity of the problem in cactus graphs, mostly establishing the presence of polynomial-time solutions for restricted families of cactus graphs (e.g., [Čevnik and Žerovnik, 2017; Ehresmann, 2021; Harutyunyan et al., 2009; Harutyunyan and Maraachlian, 2007; Harutyunyan and Maraachlian, 2008; Harutyunyan et al., 2023]). Despite these efforts, the complexity of the problem in arbitrary cactus graphs remained open. We settle this question by establishing the NP-completeness of telephone broadcasting in cactus graphs. For that, we show the problem is NP-complete in a simple subfamily of cactus graphs, which we call snowflake graphs. These graphs are not only cacti but also have pathwidth 2. These results establish that, despite being polynomial-time solvable in trees, the problem becomes NP-complete in very simple extensions of trees. On the positive side, we present constant-factor approximation algorithms for the studied families of graphs, namely, an algorithm with an approximation factor of 2 for cactus graphs and an approximation factor of 𝒪(1) for graphs of bounded pathwidth.

Recently, some studies on the fair allocation of indivisible goods notice a connection between a purely combinatorial problem called the Rainbow Cycle problem and a fairness notion known as EFX: assuming that the rainbow cycle number for parameter d (i.e. R(d)) is O(d^β .log(d)^γ), we can find a (1 − ϵ)-EFX allocation with O_ϵ(n^(β/β+1) .log(n)^(γ/β+1)) number of discarded goods. The best upper bound on R(d) is improved in a series of works to O(d^4), O(d^(2+o(1))), and finally to O(d^2). Also, via a simple observation, we have R(d) ∈ Ω(d). In this paper, we introduce another problem in extremal combinatorics. For a parameter l, we define the rainbow path degree and denote it by H(l). We show that any lower bound on H(l) yields an upper bound on R(d). Next, we prove that H(l) ∈ Ω(l^2 / log(l)) which yields an almost tight upper bound of R(d) ∈ Ω(d.log(d)). This, in turn, proves the existence of (1−ϵ)-EFX allocation with O_ϵ(√n .log(n)) number of discarded goods. In addition, for the special case of the Rainbow Cycle problem that the edges in each part form a permutation, we improve the upper bound to R(d) ≤ 2d−4. We leverage H(l) to achieve this bound. Our conjecture is that the exact value of H(l) is ⌊l^2/2⌋ − 1. We provide some experiments that support this conjecture. Assuming this conjecture is correct, we have R(d) ∈ θ(d).