While smishing (SMS Phishing) attacks have risen to become one of the most common types of social engineering attacks, there is a lack of relevant smishing datasets. One of the biggest challenges in the domain of smishing prevention is the availability of fresh smishing datasets. Additionally, as time persists, smishing campaigns are shut down and the crucial information related to the attack are lost. With the changing nature of smishing attacks, a consistent flow of new smishing examples is needed by both researchers and engineers to create effective defenses. In this paper, we present the community-sourced smishing datasets from the smishtank.com. It provides a wealth of information relevant to combating smishing attacks through the breakdown and analysis of smishing samples at the point of submission. In the contribution of our work, we provide a corpus of 1062 smishing samples that have been publicly submitted through the site. Each message includes information relating to the sender, message body, and any brands referenced in the message. Additionally, when a URL is found, we provide additional information on the domain, VirusTotal results, and a characterization of the URL. Through the open access of fresh smishing data, we empower academia and industries to create robust defenses against this evolving threat.

Text phish messages, referred to as Smishing (SMS + phishing) is a type of social engineering attack where fake text messages are created, and used to lure users into responding to those messages. These messages aim to obtain user credentials, install malware on the phones, or launch smishing attacks. They ask users to reply to their message, click on a URL that redirects them to a phishing website, or call the provided number. Drawing inspiration by the works of Tu et al. on Robocalls and Tischer et al. on USB drives, this paper investigates why smishing works. Accordingly, we designed smishing experiments and sent phishing SMSes to 265 users to measure the efficacy of smishing attacks. We sent eight fake text messages to participants and recorded their CLICK, REPLY, and CALL responses along with their feedback in a post-test survey. Our results reveal that 16.92% of our participants had potentially fallen for our smishing attack. To test repeat phishing, we subjected a set of randomly selected participants to a second round of smishing attacks with a different message than the one they received in the first round. As a result, we observed that 12.82% potentially fell for the attack again. Using logistic regression, we observed that a combination of user REPLY and CLICK actions increased the odds that a user would respond to our smishing message when compared to CLICK. Additionally, we found a similar statistically significant increase when comparing Facebook and Walmart entity scenario to our IRS baseline. Based on our results, we pinpoint essentially message attributes and demographic features that contribute to a statistically significant change in the response rates to smishing attacks.

Facial Recognition Technology (FRT) is a pioneering field of mass surveillance that sparks privacy concerns and is considered a growing threat in the modern world. FRT has been widely adopted in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to improve public services and surveillance. Accordingly, the following study aims to understand the privacy and security concerns, trust, and acceptance of FRT in Saudi Arabia. Validated Privacy Concerns (IUIPC-8), Security Attitudes (SA-6), and Security Behavior (SeBIS) scales are used along with replicate studies from Pew Research Center trust questions and government trust questions. In addition, we examine potential differences between Saudis and Americans. To gain insights into these concerns, we conducted an online survey involving 53 Saudi Arabia citizens who are residing in the USA. We have collected data in the US instead of Saudi Arabia to avoid the regulatory challenges of the Saudi Data & Artificial Intelligence Authority (SDAIA). Responses from closed-ended questions revealed that Saudis score much lower than Americans when it comes to security attitudes, whereas they score lower when it comes to privacy concerns. We found no significant difference between Saudis’ and Americans’ acceptance of the use of FRT in different scenarios, but we found that Saudis trust advertisers more than Americans. Additionally, Saudis are more likely than Americans to agree that the government should strictly limit the use of FRT.

Smishing, also known as SMS phishing, is a type of fraudulent communication in which an attacker disguises SMS communications to deceive a target into providing their sensitive data. Smishing attacks use a variety of tactics; however, they have a similar goal of stealing money or personally identifying information (PII) from a victim. In response to these attacks, a wide variety of anti-smishing tools have been developed to block or filter these communications. Despite this, the number of phishing attacks continue to rise. In this paper, we developed a test bed for measuring the effectiveness of popular anti-smishing tools against fresh smishing attacks. To collect fresh smishing data, we introduce Smishtank.com, a collaborative online resource for reporting and collecting smishing data sets. The SMS messages were validated by a security expert and an in-depth qualitative analysis was performed on the collected messages to provide further insights. To compare tool effectiveness, we experimented with 20 smishing and benign messages across 3 key segments of the SMS messaging delivery ecosystem. Our results revealed significant room for improvement in all 3 areas against our smishing set. Most anti-phishing apps and bulk messaging services didn't filter smishing messages beyond the carrier blocking. The 2 apps that blocked the most smish also blocked 85-100% of benign messages. Finally, while carriers did not block any benign messages, they were only able to reach a 25-35% blocking rate for smishing messages. Our work provides insights into the performance of anti-smishing tools and the roles they play in the message blocking process. This paper would enable the research community and industry to be better informed on the current state of anti-smishing technology on the SMS platform.

Access control is the core security mechanism of an operating system (OS). Ideally, the access control system should enforce context integrity, i.e., an application can only access security and privacy sensitive resources expected by users. Unfortunately, existing access control systems, including the permission systems in modern OS like iOS and Android, all fail to enforce context integrity thus allow apps to abuse their permissions. A naive approach to enforce context integrity is to prompt users every time a sensitive resource is accessed, but this will quickly lead to habituation. The state-of-art solutions include (1) user-driven access control, which binds a predefined context to protected GUI elements and (2) predicting users' authorization decision based on their previous behaviors and privacy preferences. However, previous studies have shown that the first approach is vulnerable to attacks (e.g., clickjacking) and the second approach i challenging to implement as it is difficult to infer the context. In this work, we explore the feasibility of a novel approach to enforce the context integrity---by inferring what task users want to do under the given context from their neural signals; then automatically authorizes access to a predefined set of sensitive resources that are necessary for that task. We conducted a comprehensive user study including 41 participants where we collected their neural signals when they were performing tasks that required access to sensitive resources. After preprocessing and features extraction, we trained machine learning classifier to infer what kind of tasks a user wants to perform. The experiment results show that the classifier was able to infer the high-level intents like take a photo with a weighted average precision of 88%.

Detecting phishing attacks (identifying fake vs. real websites) and heeding security warnings represent classical user-centered security tasks subjected to a series of prior investigations. However, our understanding of user behavior underlying these tasks is still not fully mature, motivating further work concentrating at the neuro-physiological level governing the human processing of such tasks.