Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Fucai Ke

dblp:336/6982 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9709-1305ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Vision and language · 62% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 26% Multi-agent systems · 11%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning
1.622025
DWIM: Towards Tool-Aware Visual Reasoning via Discrepancy-Aware Workflow Generation & Instruct-Masking Tuning · ICCV 2025
HYDRA: A Hyper Agent for Dynamic Compositional Visual Reasoning · ECCV (20) 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning
0.912025
Naver: a Neuro-Symbolic Compositional Automaton for Visual Grounding with Explicit Logic Reasoning · ICCV 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
probabilistic reasoning
0.912025
Naver: a Neuro-Symbolic Compositional Automaton for Visual Grounding with Explicit Logic Reasoning · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual grounding
0.912025
Naver: a Neuro-Symbolic Compositional Automaton for Visual Grounding with Explicit Logic Reasoning · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual reasoning
compositional visual reasoning
0.812024
HYDRA: A Hyper Agent for Dynamic Compositional Visual Reasoning · ECCV (20) 2024
Automata and formal languages
finite automata
0.312025
Naver: a Neuro-Symbolic Compositional Automaton for Visual Grounding with Explicit Logic Reasoning · ICCV 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neuro-symbolic reasoning · 1.7large language model · 1.7vision-language models · 0.9vision-language model · 0.9instruction masking tuning · 0.9hyper agent · 0.8dynamic composition · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Naver: a Neuro-Symbolic Compositional Automaton for Visual Grounding with Explicit Logic Reasoning
abstract
Visual Grounding (VG) tasks, such as referring expression detection and segmentation tasks are important for linking visual entities to context, especially in complex reasoning tasks that require detailed query interpretation. This paper explores VG beyond basic perception, highlighting challenges for methods that require reasoning like human cognition. Recent advances in large language methods (LLMs) and Vision-Language methods (VLMs) have improved abilities for visual comprehension, contextual understanding, and reasoning. These methods are mainly split into end-to-end and compositional methods, with the latter offering more flexibility. Compositional approaches that integrate LLMs and foundation models show promising performance but still struggle with complex reasoning with language-based logical representations. To address these limitations, we propose NAVER, a compositional visual grounding method that integrates explicit probabilistic logic reasoning within a finite-state automaton, equipped with a self-correcting mechanism. This design improves robustness and interpretability in inference through explicit logic reasoning. Our results show that NAVER achieves SoTA performance comparing to recent end-to-end and compositional baselines. The code is available at https://github.com/ControlNet/NAVER .
Zhixi Cai, Fucai Ke, Simindokht Jahangard, Maria Garcia de la Banda, Gholamreza Haffari, Peter J. Stuckey, Seyed Hamid Rezatofighi
ICCV2
2025 DWIM: Towards Tool-Aware Visual Reasoning via Discrepancy-Aware Workflow Generation & Instruct-Masking Tuning
Fucai Ke, Xingjian Leng, Zhixi Cai, Zaid Khan 0001, Weiqing Wang 0001, Pari Delir Haghighi, Seyed Hamid Rezatofighi, Manmohan Krishna Chandraker
ICCV1
2024 HYDRA: A Hyper Agent for Dynamic Compositional Visual Reasoning
Fucai Ke, Zhixi Cai, Simindokht Jahangard, Weiqing Wang 0001, Pari Delir Haghighi, Seyed Hamid Rezatofighi
ECCV (20)1
2024 HiTSKT: A hierarchical transformer model for session-aware knowledge tracing
abstract
Knowledge tracing (KT) aims to leverage students’ learning histories to estimate their mastery levels on a set of pre-defined skills, based on which the corresponding future performance can be accurately predicted. In practice, a student’s learning history comprises answers to sets of massed questions, each known as a session, rather than merely being a sequence of independent answers. Theoretically, within and across these sessions, students’ learning dynamics can be very different. Therefore, how to effectively model the dynamics of students’ knowledge states within and across the sessions is crucial for handling the KT problem. Most existing KT models treat student’s learning records as a single continuing sequence, without capturing the sessional shift of students’ knowledge state. To address the above issue, we propose a novel hierarchical transformer model, named HiTSKT, comprises an interaction(-level) encoder to capture the knowledge a student acquires within a session, and a session(-level) encoder to summarise acquired knowledge across the past sessions. To predict an interaction in the current session, a knowledge retriever integrates the summarised past-session knowledge with the previous interactions’ information into proper knowledge representations. These representations are then used to compute the student’s current knowledge state. Additionally, to model the student’s long-term forgetting behaviour across the sessions, a power-law-decay attention mechanism is designed and deployed in the session encoder, allowing it to emphasize more on the recent sessions. Extensive experiments on four public datasets demonstrate that HiTSKT achieves new state-of-the-art performance on all the datasets compared with seven state-of-the-art KT models.
Fucai Ke, Weiqing Wang 0001, Weicong Tan, Lan Du 0002, Yujin Huang, Hongzhi Yin
Knowl. Based Syst.1