Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jack Douglas

dblp:336/7289 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Security and privacy of machine learning
machine unlearning
0.712023
Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attacks · NeurIPS 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack
0.712023
Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attacks · NeurIPS 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning › poisoning attack
clean-label attack
0.212023
Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attacks · NeurIPS 2023
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
targeted attack
0.212023
Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attacks · NeurIPS 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retraining · 0.7machine unlearning · 0.7data poisoning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attacks
abstract
We introduce camouflaged data poisoning attacks, a new attack vector that arises in the context of machine unlearning and other settings when model retraining may be induced. An adversary first adds a few carefully crafted points to the training dataset such that the impact on the model's predictions is minimal. The adversary subsequently triggers a request to remove a subset of the introduced points at which point the attack is unleashed and the model's predictions are negatively affected. In particular, we consider clean-label targeted attacks (in which the goal is to cause the model to misclassify a specific test point) on datasets including CIFAR-10, Imagenette, and Imagewoof. This attack is realized by constructing camouflage datapoints that mask the effect of a poisoned dataset. We demonstrate efficacy of our attack when unlearning is performed via retraining from scratch, the idealized setting of machine unlearning which other efficient methods attempt to emulate, as well as against the approximate unlearning approach of Graves et al. (2021).
Jimmy Z. Di, Jack Douglas, Jayadev Acharya, Gautam Kamath 0001, Ayush Sekhari
NeurIPS2