Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jack Douglas
dblp:336/7289
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning
machine unlearning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attacks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning
poisoning attack |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attacks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › poisoning attack
clean-label attack |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attacks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
targeted attack |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning Attacks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retraining · 0.7machine unlearning · 0.7data poisoning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Hidden Poison: Machine Unlearning Enables Camouflaged Poisoning AttacksabstractWe introduce camouflaged data poisoning attacks, a new attack vector that arises in the context of machine unlearning and other settings when model retraining may be induced. An adversary first adds a few carefully crafted points to the training dataset such that the impact on the model's predictions is minimal. The adversary subsequently triggers a request to remove a subset of the introduced points at which point the attack is unleashed and the model's predictions are negatively affected. In particular, we consider clean-label targeted attacks (in which the goal is to cause the model to misclassify a specific test point) on datasets including CIFAR-10, Imagenette, and Imagewoof. This attack is realized by constructing camouflage datapoints that mask the effect of a poisoned dataset. We demonstrate efficacy of our attack when unlearning is performed via retraining from scratch, the idealized setting of machine unlearning which other efficient methods attempt to emulate, as well as against the approximate unlearning approach of Graves et al. (2021). Jimmy Z. Di, Jack Douglas, Jayadev Acharya, Gautam Kamath 0001, Ayush Sekhari |
NeurIPS | 2 |