Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Larby

dblp:336/7436 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-1153-4166ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
passivity-based control
1.012026
Optimal Virtual Model Control for Robotics: Design and Tuning of Passivity-Based Controllers · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2026
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
1.012026
Optimal Virtual Model Control for Robotics: Design and Tuning of Passivity-Based Controllers · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2026
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › impedance control
virtual model control
1.012026
Optimal Virtual Model Control for Robotics: Design and Tuning of Passivity-Based Controllers · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization · 1.0algorithmic differentiation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Optimal Virtual Model Control for Robotics: Design and Tuning of Passivity-Based Controllers
abstract
Passivity-based control is a cornerstone of control theory and an established design approach in robotics. Its strength is based on the passivity theorem, which provides a powerful interconnection framework for robotics. However, the design of passivity-based controllers and their optimal tuning remain challenging. We propose here an intuitive design approach for fully actuated robots, where the control action is determined by a ‘virtual-mechanism’ as in classical virtual model control. The result is a robot whose controlled behavior can be understood in terms of physics. We achieve optimal tuning by applying algorithmic differentiation to ODE simulations of the rigid body dynamics. Overall, this leads to a flexible design and optimization approach: stability is proven by passivity of the virtual mechanism, while performance is obtained by optimization using algorithmic differentiation.
Daniel Larby, Fulvio Forni
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2024 Virtual model control for compliant reaching under uncertainties
abstract
Virtual Model Control (VMC) is an approach to design a controller for force-controlled robots in complex uncertain environments. While this method was primarily investigated for legged robot locomotion in the past, it can be more generally applicable to other types of robotic systems. This paper investigates the VMC framework for reaching tasks in a force-controlled robotic arm. We propose six different approaches to designing virtual models in order to achieve reaching tasks in environments with obstacles and uncertainties. A force-controlled 8 degree-of-freedom humanoid robot was used to validate the proposed approach in the real world. We conducted three experiments to test the performance of VMC controllers in terms of predictability, sensitivity to external force, and adaptability against known and unknown obstacles. Experimental analyses show that, even though the proposed approach needs to sacrifice accuracy and trajectory optimality, it enables us to design complex reaching motions under uncertainties, in an intuitive and extendable manner.
Yi Zhang 0121, Daniel Larby, Fumiya Iida, Fulvio Forni
IROS2