Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Qixia Liu
dblp:337/0574
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-7689-6742ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 44% Compilers and program optimization · 44% Software testing · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation
neural program synthesis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Test-Driven Multi-Task Learning with Functionally Equivalent Code Transformation for Neural Code Generation · ASE 2022 |
Compilers and program optimization
program transformation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Test-Driven Multi-Task Learning with Functionally Equivalent Code Transformation for Neural Code Generation · ASE 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
program analysis · 0.6multi-task learning · 0.6deep learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Test-Driven Multi-Task Learning with Functionally Equivalent Code Transformation for Neural Code GenerationabstractAutomated code generation is a longstanding challenge in both communities of software engineering and artificial intelligence. Currently, some works have started to investigate the functional correctness of code generation, where a code snippet is considered correct if it passes a set of test cases. However, most existing works still model code generation as text generation without considering program-specific information, such as functionally equivalent code snippets and test execution feedback. To address the above limitations, this paper proposes a method combining program analysis with deep learning for neural code generation, where functionally equivalent code snippets and test execution feedback will be considered at the training stage. Concretely, we firstly design several code transformation heuristics to produce different variants of the code snippet satisfying the same functionality. In addition, we employ the test execution feedback and design a test-driven discriminative task to train a novel discriminator, aiming to let the model distinguish whether the generated code is correct or not. The preliminary results on a newly published dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed framework for code generation. Particularly, in terms of the [email protected] metric, we achieve 8.81 and 11.53 gains compared with CodeGPT and CodeT5, respectively. Xin Wang 0114, Xiao Liu 0004, Pingyi Zhou, Qixia Liu, Jin Liu 0016, Hao Wu 0010, Xiaohui Cui |
ASE | 4 |