EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bingnuo Chen
dblp:337/1045
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 67% Software maintenance and evolution · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software maintenance and evolution
code readability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How students choose names: A replication study · ASE 2022 |
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How students choose names: A replication study · ASE 2022 |
Empirical software engineering
identifier naming conventions |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How students choose names: A replication study · ASE 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey · 0.6replication study · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | How students choose names: A replication studyabstractNames of classes/methods/variables play an important role in code readability. To investigate how developers choose names, Feitelson et al. conducted an empirical survey and suggested a method to improve naming quality. We replicated their study, but limited the survey subjects to university students. Specifically, we conducted two experiments including 341 students from freshmen to seniors. The aim of the first experiment was to investigate the characteristics of the names given by students. The experimental results showed that the name length as well as the number of words contained in names increased with the grade and students have ambiguity in understanding variable names. The second experiment was to verify whether Feitelson et al.’s naming method can help improve the quality of the names given by students. The experimental results showed an improvement in naming quality for more than 67% of cases, which confirms the validity of the method for university students. Qing Mi, Bingnuo Chen |
ASE | 3 |