Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Chenhao Zhang 0006

dblp:337/1091-6 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0009-9619-2935ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Rendering · 61% Geometric modeling and processing · 39%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Rendering › gaussian splatting
3d gaussian splatting
0.912025
Improving Gaussian Splatting with Localized Points Management · CVPR 2025
Geometric modeling and processing › 3d reconstruction › 3d scene reconstruction
dynamic scene reconstruction
0.912025
Improving Gaussian Splatting with Localized Points Management · CVPR 2025
Rendering
neural rendering
0.912025
Improving Gaussian Splatting with Localized Points Management · CVPR 2025
Geometric modeling and processing
multi-view geometry
0.312025
Improving Gaussian Splatting with Localized Points Management · CVPR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

localized point management · 0.9adaptive density control · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Improving Gaussian Splatting with Localized Points Management
abstract
Point management is critical for optimizing 3D Gaussian Splatting models, as point initiation (e.g., via structure from motion) is often distributionally inappropriate. Typically, Adaptive Density Control (ADC) algorithm is adopted, leveraging view-averaged gradient magnitude thresholding for point densification, opacity thresholding for pruning, and regular all-points opacity reset. We reveal that this strategy is limited in tackling intricate/special image regions (e.g., transparent) due to inability of identifying all 3D zones requiring point densification, and lacking an appropriate mechanism to handle ill-conditioned points with negative impacts (e.g., occlusion due to false high opacity). To address these limitations, we propose a Localized Point Management (LPM) strategy, capable of identifying those error-contributing zones in greatest need for both point addition and geometry calibration. Zone identification is achieved by leveraging the underlying multiview geometry constraints, subject to image rendering errors. We apply point densification in the identified zones and then reset the opacity of the points in front of these regions, creating a new opportunity to correct poorly conditioned points. Serving as a versatile plugin, LPM can be seamlessly integrated into existing static 3D and dynamic 4D Gaussian Splatting models with minimal additional cost. Experimental evaluations validate the efficacy of our LPM in boosting a variety of existing 3D/4D models both quantitatively and qualitatively. Notably, LPM improves both static 3DGS and dynamic SpaceTimeGS to achieve state-of-the-art rendering quality while retaining real-time speeds, excelling on challenging datasets such as Tanks & Temples and the Neural 3D Video dataset.
Haosen Yang 0003, Chenhao Zhang 0006, Wenqing Wang 0002, Marco Volino, Adrian Hilton 0001, Li Zhang 0040, Xiatian Zhu
CVPR2