Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nohyun Ki
dblp:337/1665
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
data pruning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BWS: Best Window Selection Based on Sample Scores for Data Pruning across Broad Ranges · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
data subset selection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | BWS: Best Window Selection Based on Sample Scores for Data Pruning across Broad Ranges · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning and data management
data valuation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Data Valuation Without Training of a Model · ICLR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
kernel ridge regression · 0.8difficulty scores · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | BWS: Best Window Selection Based on Sample Scores for Data Pruning across Broad RangesabstractData subset selection aims to find a smaller yet informative subset of a large dataset that can approximate the full-dataset training, addressing challenges associated with training neural networks on large-scale datasets. However, existing methods tend to specialize in either high or low selection ratio regimes, lacking a universal approach that consistently achieves competitive performance across a broad range of selection ratios. We introduce a universal and efficient data subset selection method, Best Window Selection (BWS), by proposing a method to choose the best window subset from samples ordered based on their difficulty scores. This approach offers flexibility by allowing the choice of window intervals that span from easy to difficult samples. Furthermore, we provide an efficient mechanism for selecting the best window subset by evaluating its quality using kernel ridge regression. Our experimental results demonstrate the superior performance of BWS compared to other baselines across a broad range of selection ratios over datasets, including CIFAR-10/100 and ImageNet, and the scenarios involving training from random initialization or fine-tuning of pre-trained models. Hoyong Choi, Nohyun Ki, Hye Won Chung |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | Data Valuation Without Training of a Model
Nohyun Ki, Hoyong Choi, Hye Won Chung |
ICLR | 1 |