To design performant, expressive, and reliable cyber-physical systems (CPSs), researchers extensively perform quasi-static scheduling for concurrent models of computation (MoCs) on multi-core hardware. However, these quasi-static scheduling approaches are developed independently for their corresponding MoCs, despite commonality in the approaches. To help generalize the use of quasi-static scheduling to new and emerging MoCs, this article proposes a unified approach for a class of deterministic timed concurrent models (DTCMs), including prominent models such as synchronous dataflow (SDF), Boolean-controlled dataflow (BDF), scenario-aware dataflow (SADF), and Logical Execution Time (LET). In contrast to scheduling techniques tailored exclusively to specific MoCs, our unified approach leverages a common intermediate formalism called state space finite automata (SSFA), bridging the gap between high-level MoCs and executable schedules. Once identified as DTCMs, new MoCs can directly adopt SSFA-based scheduling, significantly easing adoption. We show that quasi-static schedules facilitated by SSFA are provably free from timing anomalies and enable straightforward worst-case makespan analysis. We demonstrate the approach using the reactor model—an emerging discrete-event MoC—programmed using the Lingua Franca ( LF ) language. Experiments show that quasi-statically scheduled LF programs exhibit lower runtime overhead compared to the dynamically scheduled LF programs, and that the analyzable worst-case makespans enable compile-time deadline checking.

Actor frameworks and similar reactive programming techniques are widely used for building concurrent systems. They promise to be efficient and scale well to a large number of cores or nodes in a distributed system. However, they also expose programmers to nondeterminism, which often makes implementations hard to understand, debug, and test. The recently proposed reactor model is a promising alternative that enables deterministic concurrency. In this article, we present an efficient, parallel implementation of reactors and demonstrate that the determinacy of reactors does not imply a loss in performance. To show this, we evaluate Lingua Franca (LF), a reactor-oriented coordination language. LF equips mainstream programming languages with a deterministic concurrency model that automatically takes advantage of opportunities to exploit parallelism. Our implementation of the Savina benchmark suite demonstrates that, in terms of execution time, the runtime performance of LF programs even exceeds popular and highly optimized actor frameworks. We compare against Akka and CAF, which LF outperforms by 1.86× and 1.42×, respectively.